A trend analysis of over 190 000 online ratings of orthopaedists over the last 11 years

被引:0
作者
Meszmer, Nina [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Lehrstuhl Gesundheitsmanagement, Lange Gasse 20, D-90403 Nurnberg, Germany
来源
GESUNDHEITSOEKONOMIE UND QUALITAETSMANAGEMENT | 2021年 / 26卷 / 03期
关键词
Public Reporting; physician-rating websites; online ratings; transparency; internet;
D O I
10.1055/a-1323-3884
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of this study was to analyze online ratings of orthopaedists over the last 11 years based on the most frequently used physician-rating-website jameda. Furthermore, it should be evaluated if there was an association between the number of ratings and the mean rating. Methods An analysis of all published online ratings of orthopaedists on jameda was conducted from 2008 to 2018.Firstly, descriptive statistics (e.g. number of online ratings) were performed cumulatively and for each year. Secondly, for each year the orthopaedists were divided in 3 groups based on their number of ratings (below-average, average, above average) and it was evaluated if the mean rating significantly differs between these 3 groups (Kruskal-Wallis-test, Mann-Whitney-U-test). Results In sum, the 8126 orthopaedists received 193787 online ratings with a mean rating of 1.97 (SD 1.62). The mean rating of the evaluated orthopaedists has been improving over the last eleven years from 2.38 (SD 1.60) to 2.02 (SD 0.96). The mean number of ratings was 23.85 (SD 32.49). The number of revaluations increased continuously, although the revaluations in 2018 were lower than in the previous year (33,759 vs. 34,367). Orthopaedists with the highest number of ratings often showed a significantly better rating than orthopaedists with a lower number of ratings. For example, in 2018 orthopaedists with the highest number of ratings were significantly better evaluated than orthopaedists with a lower number of ratings (1.90 vs. 2.17 vs. 2.06; p<0.001). Conclusions The active use of the physician-rating-website jameda, based on the number of revaluations and rated orthopaedists, considerably increased over the last years, although the number of revaluations stagnated in 2018. The mean rating of orthopaedists increasingly improved, whereas orthopaedists with the highest number of ratings received better ratings than orthopaedists with a lower number of ratings.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 153
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
aerzteblatt.de, RECH ZEIGHT VERZ BEI
[2]  
Bakhsh Wajeeh, 2014, Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), V43, P359
[3]  
Bundesarztekammer, ARZTL VERS DEUTSCHL
[4]  
Bundesarztekammer, ARZT ZUM 31 DEC
[5]  
Emmert M, 2017, DTSCH ARZTEBLATT, V114, pA731
[6]   A Decade of Online Physician-Rating Websites in Germany: an Assessment of the Current Level of Development [J].
Emmert, Martin ;
Meszmer, Nina .
GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2018, 80 (10) :851-858
[7]   Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians' Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period [J].
Emmert, Martin ;
Sauter, Lisa ;
Jablonski, Lisa ;
Sander, Uwe ;
Taheri-Zadeh, Fatemeh .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (07)
[8]   Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study [J].
Emmert, Martin ;
Meszmer, Nina ;
Sander, Uwe .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (09)
[9]   What do patients say about their physicians? An analysis of 3000 narrative comments posted on a German physician rating website [J].
Emmert, Martin ;
Meier, Florian ;
Heider, Ann-Kathrin ;
Duerr, Christoph ;
Sander, Uwe .
HEALTH POLICY, 2014, 118 (01) :66-73
[10]   Physician Choice Making and Characteristics Associated With Using Physician-Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study [J].
Emmert, Martin ;
Meier, Florian ;
Pisch, Frank ;
Sander, Uwe .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (08)