Profit efficiency of tea farmers: case study of safe and conventional farms in Northern Vietnam

被引:17
作者
Bac Van Ho [1 ,2 ]
Nanseki, Teruaki [3 ]
Chomei, Yosuke [3 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Bioresource & Bioenvironm Sci, Higashi Ku, Hakozaki 6-10-1, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 8128581, Japan
[2] Thai Nguyen Univ Agr & Forestry, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam
[3] Kyushu Univ, Fac Agr, Higashi Ku, Hakozaki 6-10-1, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 8128581, Japan
关键词
Profit efficiency; Propensity score matching; Safe tea; VietGAP; Vietnam; ECONOMIC-EFFICIENCY; PROPENSITY SCORE; SYSTEM; AGRICULTURE; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-017-0073-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Safe tea production conducted under the standards of Vietnamese Good Agricultural Practices has been strongly encouraged by the Vietnam government. However, there is no study on profit efficiency of safe tea producers, which are therefore barriers for farmers and policymakers in terms of extending the safe tea production practice in Vietnam. Thus, this study investigated the profit efficiency of tea production practices using a stochastic profit frontier function. We applied propensity score matching to control for self-selection in assessing the profit efficiency of safe and conventional tea farming. Our results indicated that the average profit efficiency of tea farmers was around 74%, suggesting 26% of profit was lost due to inefficiency. Furthermore, significant different profit efficiency was observed between the two farmer groups. We further found that tea farmers with larger production scale, better irrigation system, accessing extension service are more likely to adopt safe tea practices than others are. Thus, public policies should focus on improving profit efficiency and facilitating adoption of eco-friendly production practice, and also supporting innovations to improve farmers' production conditions, including the access to extension service, irrigation system, enlarged farm size, and labor-saving machinery.
引用
收藏
页码:1695 / 1713
页数:19
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Structural adjustment and economic efficiency of rice farmers in northern Ghana [J].
Abdulai, A ;
Huffman, W .
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 2000, 48 (03) :503-520
[2]  
Aigner D., 1977, Journal of Econometrics, V6, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0304-4076, 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
[3]  
Aktar M.W., 2009, INTERDISCIP TOXICOL, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.2478/V10102-009-0001-7
[4]   PROFIT EFFICIENCY AMONG BASMATI RICE PRODUCERS IN PAKISTAN PUNJAB [J].
ALI, M ;
FLINN, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1989, 71 (02) :303-310
[5]  
Ali M., 1991, Journal of International Development, V3, P1, DOI 10.1002/jid.4010030102
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, RES J APPL SCI
[7]  
Arnade C, 2002, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V27, P94
[8]  
Battese G. E., 1995, Empirical Economics, V20, P325, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01205442, 10.1007/BF01205442]
[9]   Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores [J].
Becker, Sascha O. ;
Ichino, Andrea .
STATA JOURNAL, 2002, 2 (04) :358-377
[10]   Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching [J].
Caliendo, Marco ;
Kopeinig, Sabine .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2008, 22 (01) :31-72