Why Do Politicians Tweet? Extremists, Underdogs, and Opposing Parties as Political Tweeters

被引:28
作者
Hong, Sounman [1 ]
Choi, Haneul [2 ]
Kim, Taek Kyu [3 ]
机构
[1] Seodaemungu Shinchon Yonhee Hall 113-3, Seoul 138798, South Korea
[2] Arizona State Univ, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Harry S Truman Sch Publ Affairs, Columbia, MO USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Politics; Twitter; social media; new media; political polarization; extremism; SOCIAL MEDIA; CANDIDATES USE; TWITTER; NEWS; ONLINE; FACEBOOK; BIAS; DETERMINANTS; POLARIZATION; MESSAGES;
D O I
10.1002/poi3.201
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Why do some politicians actively use social media, while others lag behind? To answer this question, we propose that opposing party politicians, underdogs, and extremists are more likely to become active political tweeters. Research has shown that media attention is generally concentrated on politicians with power; that is, ruling parties and party leaders. We thus hypothesize that politicians marginalized from media attention, namely backbenchers and those from opposing parties, may perceive greater potential benefits from social media. Further, politicians whose ideological positions do not match well with those of major news media (i.e., extremists) may perceive risks in facing tough questions from journalists, as well as the media's gatekeeping process. We thus hypothesize that extremists may perceive greater benefits from using social media, because they can control their message. We tested these hypotheses using data on U.S. Senators' public communication activities on Twitter and in press releases in 2009-2011 and found strong support.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 323
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Alger D.E., 1989, MEDIA POLITICS
[2]  
[Anonymous], JOURNALISM STUDIES
[3]   Social Media Campaigning: Mobilization and Fundraising on Facebook [J].
Auter, Zachary J. ;
Fine, Jeffrey A. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2018, 99 (01) :185-200
[4]  
Belam M., 2017, GUARDIAN
[5]   From hybrid media system to hybrid-media politicians: Danish politicians and their cross-media presence in the 2015 national election campaign [J].
Blach-Orsten, Mark ;
Eberholst, Mads Kaemsgaard ;
Burkal, Rasmus .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & POLITICS, 2017, 14 (04) :334-347
[6]   Party Strategy and Media Bias: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2005 UK Election Campaign [J].
Brandenburg, Heinz .
JOURNAL OF ELECTIONS PUBLIC OPINION AND PARTIES, 2006, 16 (02) :157-178
[7]  
Chadwick Andrew., 2013, HYBRID MEDIA SYSTEM
[8]   Twitter Use by Presidential Primary Candidates During the 2012 Campaign [J].
Conway, Bethany Anne ;
Kenski, Kate ;
Wang, Di .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2013, 57 (11) :1596-1610
[9]   Are American Politicians as Partisan Online as They are Offline? Twitter Networks in the U.S. Senate and Maine State Legislature [J].
Cook, James M. .
POLICY AND INTERNET, 2016, 8 (01) :55-71
[10]   Leaders or Brokers? Potential Influencers in Online Parliamentary Networks [J].
Del Valle, Marc Esteve ;
Borge Bravo, Rosa .
POLICY AND INTERNET, 2018, 10 (01) :61-86