Structuring Business Process Context Information for Process Monitoring and Prediction

被引:7
作者
Brunk, Jens [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, ERGS, Leonardo Campus 3, D-48149 Munster, Germany
来源
2020 IEEE 22ND CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS INFORMATICS (CBI 2020), VOL I - RESEARCH PAPERS | 2020年
关键词
Taxonomy; Business Process; Context; Context-Sensitivity; Predictive Process Monitoring;
D O I
10.1109/CBI49978.2020.00012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The advance of Big Data, the Internet of Things (IoT) and with it the integration of various systems - generally referred to as digitalization - provides huge amounts of data that can be leveraged by modern Business Process Management (BPM) methods. Predictive Process Monitoring (PPM) represents a novel branch of process mining, which deals with real-time analysis of currently running process instances and also with the prediction of its future behavior. Most of the early PPM techniques base their analyzes and predictions solely on the control-flow characteristic of a business process, i.e. the process events. Recently, researchers are attempting to incorporate additional process-related information, also known as the process context, into their predictive models. To use the available context information to full capacity, we require an understanding of the concept of business process context information. Based on both empirical and conceptual sources, we develop a taxonomy that provides a comprehensive overview of the characteristics of business process context information. This overview can then be leveraged, e.g. in process monitoring and prediction. Our taxonomy adds descriptive knowledge to the field of BPM, specifically PPM, and strengthens the conceptual foundation of context-sensitive process monitoring and prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 48
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Beinke J. H., 2018, INT C INF SYST SAN F
[2]   A Data-Driven Prediction Framework for Analyzing and Monitoring Business Process Performances [J].
Bevacqua, Antonio ;
Carnuccio, Marco ;
Folino, Francesco ;
Guarascio, Massimo ;
Pontieri, Luigi .
ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, ICEIS 2013, 2014, 190 :100-117
[3]   Event-based failure prediction in distributed business processes [J].
Borkowski, Michael ;
Fdhila, Walid ;
Nardelli, Matteo ;
Rinderle-Ma, Stefanie ;
Schulte, Stefan .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 81 :220-235
[4]  
Boukadi K., 2009, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, V42, P1376, DOI DOI 10.3182/20090603-3-RU-2001.0291
[5]  
Buneman P., 1997, Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, PODS 1997, P117, DOI 10.1145/263661.263675
[6]   A Cloud-Based Prediction Framework for Analyzing Business Process Performances [J].
Cesario, Eugenio ;
Folino, Francesco ;
Guarascio, Massimo ;
Pontieri, Luigi .
AVAILABILITY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS, CD-ARES 2016, PAML 2016, 2016, 9817 :63-80
[7]  
Cuzzocrea A., 2018, INT DATABASE ENG APP, P165, DOI DOI 10.1145/3216122.3216143
[8]  
Cuzzocrea A, 2016, IEEE IJCNN, P3809, DOI 10.1109/IJCNN.2016.7727691
[9]  
de Leoni M, 2014, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V8659, P250, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-10172-9_16
[10]   Predictive Process Monitoring Methods: Which One Suits Me Best? [J].
Di Francescomarino, Chiara ;
Ghidini, Chiara ;
Maggi, Fabrizio Maria ;
Milani, Fredrik .
BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT (BPM 2018), 2018, 11080 :462-479