A silver lining to REDD: Institutional growth despite programmatic failure

被引:12
作者
Borgerhoff Mulder, Monique [1 ,2 ]
Caro, Tim [3 ]
Ngwali, Assa Sharif [4 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Evolutionary Anthropol, Dept Human Behav Ecol & Culture, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anthropol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Bristol, Sch Biol Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Dept Forestry & Nonrenewable Nat Resources, Zanzibar, Tanzania
关键词
cultural evolution; governance; institutions; REDD plus; Zanzibar; LAND-USE; PLUS; CONSERVATION; SUSTAINABILITY; DESIGN; CARBON; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1111/csp2.312
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
What happens when conservation interventions ostensibly fail? We outline a REDD+ intervention on Zanzibar, Tanzania which is adapting to a failure to implement carbon compensation payments and to the increased global price of cloves. Using a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods we provide preliminary evidence that well-managed shehia (wards) with registered Community Forestry Management Agreements (CoFMAs) are slowing their rates of deforestation. We also find an increase in the number of shehia with CoFMAs despite the absence of carbon payments. Using this island-wide case study we make inferences about the mechanisms whereby institutional expansion has occurred in ways consistent with cultural evolutionary dynamics of institutional change. We draw lessons for planning and practice that may help with the design of future conservation interventions and with bolstering the morale and effectiveness of disappointed partners.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Changing governance of the world's forests
    Agrawal, Arun
    Chhatre, Ashwini
    Hardin, Rebecca
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2008, 320 (5882) : 1460 - 1462
  • [2] Cultural group selection and the design of REDD plus : insights from Pemba
    Andrews, J.
    Mulder, M. Borgerhoff
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (01) : 93 - 107
  • [3] Andrews J., FOREST INCOME PEMBA
  • [4] Andrews J. B., 2020, DOES REDD HAVE CHANC, P1, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0030605319001376
  • [5] Angelsen A., 2008, MOVING AHEAD REDD IS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, REDD GROUND CASE BOO
  • [7] Mainstreaming Impact Evaluation in Nature Conservation
    Baylis, Kathy
    Honey-Roses, Jordi
    Borner, Jan
    Corbera, Esteve
    Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss
    Ferraro, Paul J.
    Lapeyre, Renaud
    Persson, U. Martin
    Pfaff, Alex
    Wunder, Sven
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2016, 9 (01): : 58 - 64
  • [8] Commodification of forest carbon: REDD plus and socially embedded forest practices in Zanzibar
    Benjaminsen, Grete
    Kaarhus, Randi
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2018, 93 : 48 - 56
  • [9] Between Resistance and Consent: Project-Village Relationships When Introducing REDD
    Benjaminsen, Grete
    [J]. FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2014, 41 (03) : 377 - 398
  • [10] When community forestry meets REDD plus : has REDD plus helped address implementation barriers to participatory forest management in Tanzania?
    Blomley, Tom
    Edwards, Karen
    Kingazi, Stephano
    Lukumbuzya, Kahana
    Makela, Merja
    Vesa, Lauri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EASTERN AFRICAN STUDIES, 2017, 11 (03) : 549 - 570