A silver lining to REDD: Institutional growth despite programmatic failure

被引:13
作者
Borgerhoff Mulder, Monique [1 ,2 ]
Caro, Tim [3 ]
Ngwali, Assa Sharif [4 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Evolutionary Anthropol, Dept Human Behav Ecol & Culture, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anthropol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Bristol, Sch Biol Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Dept Forestry & Nonrenewable Nat Resources, Zanzibar, Tanzania
关键词
cultural evolution; governance; institutions; REDD plus; Zanzibar; LAND-USE; PLUS; CONSERVATION; SUSTAINABILITY; DESIGN; CARBON; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1111/csp2.312
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
What happens when conservation interventions ostensibly fail? We outline a REDD+ intervention on Zanzibar, Tanzania which is adapting to a failure to implement carbon compensation payments and to the increased global price of cloves. Using a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods we provide preliminary evidence that well-managed shehia (wards) with registered Community Forestry Management Agreements (CoFMAs) are slowing their rates of deforestation. We also find an increase in the number of shehia with CoFMAs despite the absence of carbon payments. Using this island-wide case study we make inferences about the mechanisms whereby institutional expansion has occurred in ways consistent with cultural evolutionary dynamics of institutional change. We draw lessons for planning and practice that may help with the design of future conservation interventions and with bolstering the morale and effectiveness of disappointed partners.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Changing governance of the world's forests [J].
Agrawal, Arun ;
Chhatre, Ashwini ;
Hardin, Rebecca .
SCIENCE, 2008, 320 (5882) :1460-1462
[2]   Cultural group selection and the design of REDD plus : insights from Pemba [J].
Andrews, J. ;
Mulder, M. Borgerhoff .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (01) :93-107
[3]  
Andrews J., FOREST INCOME PEMBA
[4]  
Andrews J. B., 2020, DOES REDD HAVE CHANC, P1, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0030605319001376
[5]  
Angelsen A, 2008, MOVING AHEAD REDD IS
[6]   Mainstreaming Impact Evaluation in Nature Conservation [J].
Baylis, Kathy ;
Honey-Roses, Jordi ;
Borner, Jan ;
Corbera, Esteve ;
Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss ;
Ferraro, Paul J. ;
Lapeyre, Renaud ;
Persson, U. Martin ;
Pfaff, Alex ;
Wunder, Sven .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2016, 9 (01) :58-64
[7]   Commodification of forest carbon: REDD plus and socially embedded forest practices in Zanzibar [J].
Benjaminsen, Grete ;
Kaarhus, Randi .
GEOFORUM, 2018, 93 :48-56
[8]   Between Resistance and Consent: Project-Village Relationships When Introducing REDD [J].
Benjaminsen, Grete .
FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2014, 41 (03) :377-398
[9]  
Blomley T., 2016, REDD HITS GROUND LES
[10]   When community forestry meets REDD plus : has REDD plus helped address implementation barriers to participatory forest management in Tanzania? [J].
Blomley, Tom ;
Edwards, Karen ;
Kingazi, Stephano ;
Lukumbuzya, Kahana ;
Makela, Merja ;
Vesa, Lauri .
JOURNAL OF EASTERN AFRICAN STUDIES, 2017, 11 (03) :549-570