Ultrafiltration of aqueous solutions containing a mixture of dye and surfactant

被引:29
作者
Majewska-Nowak, Katarzyna [1 ]
Kowalska, Izabela [1 ]
Kabsch-Korbutowicz, Malgorzata [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Technol, Inst Environm Protect Engn, PL-50370 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
surfactant; dye; ultrafiltration; surfactant recovery;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2006.01.023
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
A low-pressure membrane process was studied in order to treat aqueous solutions containing both dye and surfactant. The influence of various textile dyes (methyl orange, indigo carmine, amido black, titan yellow or direct black) on separation efficiency of surfactants (sodium dodecyl sulphate, SDS) was analyzed. Intersep Nadir membranes made of polyethersulfone, polysulfone, regenerated cellulose, cellulose acetate and polyamide were chosen. These membranes have different cut-off values (5, 10 and 30 kDa). Surfactant and dye concentrations in model solutions were equal to 100 g/m(3). The ultrafiltration process used pressures of 0.1 and 0.2 MPa. It was found that the SDS retention coefficient was affected not only by the kind of organic dye, but also by membrane material and membrane cut-off. For polyamide membranes the presence of organic dyes in separated solutions improved the SDS rejection, whereas for acetate cellulose and regenerated cellulose membranes, the opposite phenomenon was observed. The influence of dyes on SDS separation was almost negligible when polyethersulfone and polysulfone membranes were used. It seems that the mechanism governing SDS separation from solutions containing anionic dyes can be explained by the adsorption of surfactant monomers and dye particles in the pore interior of the membranes or by converting pre-micelles to micelles.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 157
页数:9
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Separation of an anionic surfactant by nanofiltration [J].
Archer, AC ;
Mendes, AM ;
Boaventura, RAR .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 33 (16) :2758-2764
[2]   Ceramic membrane ultrafiltration of anionic and nonionic surfactant solutions [J].
Fernández, E ;
Benito, JM ;
Pazos, C ;
Coca, J .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2005, 246 (01) :1-6
[3]   Water network optimisation in the process industry - case study of a liquid detergent plant [J].
Forstmeier, M ;
Goers, B ;
Wozny, G .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2005, 13 (05) :495-498
[4]   Optimised product and water recovery from batch-production rinsing waters [J].
Goers, B ;
Mey, J ;
Wozny, G .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (08) :651-658
[5]   Removal of aromatic compounds in the aqueous solution via micellar enhanced ultrafiltration: Part 1. Behavior of nonionic surfactants [J].
Kim, CK ;
Kim, SS ;
Kim, DW ;
Lim, JC ;
Kim, JJ .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1998, 147 (01) :13-22
[6]  
KOWALSKA I, 2001, ENV PROTECTION ENG, V27, P19
[7]   Ultrafiltration of SDS solutions using polymeric membranes [J].
Majewska-Nowak, K ;
Kowalska, I ;
Kabsch-Korbutowicz, M .
DESALINATION, 2005, 184 (1-3) :415-422
[8]  
MajewskaNowak K, 1996, 7TH WORLD FILTRATION CONGRESS, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS I AND II, P885
[9]   Removal of dye from wastewater using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration and recovery of surfactant [J].
Purkait, MK ;
DasGupta, S ;
De, S .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 37 (01) :81-92
[10]   A study of dye-surfactant interactions. Part 1. Effect of chemical structure of acid dyes and surfactants on the complex formation [J].
Simoncic, B ;
Span, J .
DYES AND PIGMENTS, 1998, 36 (01) :1-14