Systematic Review of Pelvic Exenteration With En Bloc Sacrectomy for Recurrent Rectal Adenocarcinoma: R0 Resection Predicts Disease-free Survival

被引:49
作者
Sasikumar, Amarasingam [1 ]
Bhan, Chetan [2 ]
Jenkins, John T. [1 ]
Antoniou, Anthony [1 ]
Murphy, Jamie [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] St Marks Hosp, Complex Canc Clin, Watford Rd, Harrow, Middx, England
[2] Whittington Hosp, Dept Surg, London, England
[3] Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, Acad Surg Unit, London, England
关键词
Cancer; Rectum; Recurrence; Sacrectomy; LOCALLY ADVANCED PRIMARY; SACRAL RESECTION; ABDOMINOSACRAL RESECTION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; MORBIDITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000000737
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The management of recurrent rectal cancer is challenging. At the present time, pelvic exenteration with en bloc sacrectomy offers the only hope of a lasting cure. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome measures and complication rates following sacrectomy for recurrent rectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted on Pub Med for English language articles relevant to sacrectomy for recurrent rectal cancer with no time limitations. STUDY SELECTION: Studies reported sacrectomy with survival data for recurrent rectal adenocarcinoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Disease-free survival following sacrectomy for recurrent rectal cancer was the main outcome measured. RESULTS: A total of 220 patients with recurrent rectal cancer were included from 7 studies, of which 160 were men and 60 were women. Overall median operative time was 717 (570-992) minutes and blood loss was 3.7 (1.7-6.2) L. An R0 (>1-mm resection margin) resection was achieved in 78% of patients. Disease-free survival associated with R0 resection was 55% at a median follow-up period of 33 (17-60) months; however, none of the patients with R1 (<1- mm resection margin) survived this period. Postoperative complication rates and median length of stay were found to decrease with more distal sacral transection levels. In contrast, R1 resection rates increased with more distal transection. LIMITATION: The studies assessed by this review were retrospective case series and thus are subject to significant bias. CONCLUSION: Sacrectomy performed for patients with recurrent rectal cancer is associated with significant postoperative morbidity. Morbidity and postoperative length of stay increase with the level of sacral transection. Nevertheless, approximately half of patients eligible for rectal excision with en bloc sacrectomy may benefit from disease-free survival for up to 33 months, with R0 resection predicting disease-free survival in the medium term.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 352
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes
    Bhangu, A.
    Beynon, J.
    Brown, G.
    Chang, G.
    Das, P.
    Desai, A.
    Frizelle, F.
    Glynne-Jones, R.
    Goldin, R.
    Hawkins, M. A.
    Heriot, A.
    Laurberg, S.
    Mirnezami, A.
    Nicholls, R. J.
    Sagar, P.
    Tekkis, P.
    Vuong, T.
    Wilson, M.
    Ali, S. M.
    Antoniou, A.
    Bose, P.
    Boyle, K.
    Branagan, G.
    Burling, D.
    Clark, S. K.
    Colquhoun, P.
    Crane, C. H.
    Darzi, A.
    Davies, M.
    Delaney, C. P.
    Dietz, D.
    Dozois, E. J.
    Duff, M.
    Dziki, A.
    Faria, J.
    Fitzgerald, J. E.
    Georgiou, P.
    George, B.
    George, M. L.
    Gupta, A.
    Guy, R.
    Harji, D. P.
    Harris, D. A.
    Herzig, D.
    Holm, T.
    Hompes, R.
    Jeys, L.
    Jenkins, J. T.
    Kiran, R. P.
    Koh, C. E.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (08) : E1 - E33
  • [2] Outcome of abdominosacral resection for locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer
    Bhangu, A.
    Brown, G.
    Akmal, M.
    Tekkis, P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (10) : 1453 - 1461
  • [3] BOLTON JS, 1988, J NATL MED ASSOC, V80, P561
  • [4] Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer
    Boyle, KM
    Sagar, PM
    Chalmers, AG
    Sebag-Montefiore, D
    Cairns, A
    Eardley, I
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (05) : 929 - 937
  • [5] Posterior high sacral segmental disconnection prior to anterior en bloc exenteration for recurrent rectal cancer
    Brown, K. G. M.
    Solomon, M. J.
    Austin, K. K. S.
    Lee, P. J.
    Stalley, P.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2016, 20 (06) : 401 - 404
  • [6] Extended Sacropelvic Resection For Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: Can It Be Done Safely and With Good Oncologic Outcomes?
    Colibaseanu, Dorin T.
    Dozois, Eric J.
    Mathis, Kellie L.
    Rose, Peter S.
    Ugarte, Maria L. Martinez
    Abdelsattar, Zaid M.
    Williams, Michael D.
    Larson, David W.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [7] Impact of Flap Reconstruction on Perineal Wound Complications Following Ablative Surgery for Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancers
    Davidge, Kristen M.
    Raghuram, Kamini
    Hofer, Stefan O. P.
    Ferguson, Peter C.
    Wunder, Jay S.
    Swallow, Carol J.
    Zhong, Toni
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (06) : 2068 - 2073
  • [8] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D
    Demartines, N
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [9] High Sacrectomy for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: Can Long-Term Survival Be Achieved?
    Dozois, E. J.
    Privitera, A.
    Holubar, S. D.
    Aldrete, J. F.
    Sim, F. H.
    Rose, P. S.
    Walsh, M. F.
    Bower, T. C.
    Leibovich, B. C.
    Nelson, H.
    Larson, D. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 103 (02) : 105 - 109
  • [10] Partial anterior sacrectomy with nerve preservation to treat locally advanced rectal cancer
    Evans, M. D.
    Harji, D. P.
    Sagar, P. M.
    Wilson, J.
    Koshy, A.
    Timothy, J.
    Giannoudis, P. V.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (06) : E336 - E339