Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine for locally advanced anal carcinoma: an alternative treatment option

被引:58
作者
Meulendijks, D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dewit, L. [4 ]
Tomasoa, N. B. [4 ]
van Tinteren, H. [5 ]
Beijnen, J. H. [6 ,7 ]
Schellens, J. H. M. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Cats, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Div Clin Pharmacol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Mol Pathol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Biometr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Slotervaart Hosp, Dept Pharm & Pharmacol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Utrecht, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Fac Sci, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Clin Pharmacol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
anal canal carcinoma; chemoradiotherapy; capecitabine; fluorouracil; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; anal cancer; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; RADIATION-THERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MITOMYCIN-C; CANCER; CHEMORADIATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; IRRADIATION; DURATION;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2014.467
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Capecitabine is an established treatment alternative to intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for patients with rectal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy. Its place in the treatment of locally advanced anal carcinoma (AC), however, remains undetermined. We investigated whether capecitabine is as effective as 5-FU in the treatment of patients with locally advanced AC. Methods: One hundred and five patients with squamous cell AC stage T2-4 (T2>4 cm), N0-1, M0 or T1-4, N2-3, M0, were included in this retrospective study. Forty-seven patients were treated with continuous 5-FU (750 mg m(-2)) on days 1-5 and 29-33, mitomycin C (MMC, 10 mg m(-2)) on day 1, and radiotherapy; 58 patients were treated with capecitabine (825 mg m(-2) b.i.d. on weekdays), MMC (10 mg m(-2)) on day 1, and radiotherapy. The primary end points of the study were: clinical complete response rate, locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were: colostomy-free survival (CFS), toxicity and associations of genetic polymorphisms (GSTT1, GSTM1, GSTP1 and TYMS) with outcome and toxicity. Results: Clinical complete response was achieved in 41/46 patients (89.1%) with 5-FU and in 52/58 patients (89.7%) with capecitabine. Three-year LRC was 76% and 79% (P = 0.690, log-rank test), 3-year OS was 78% and 86% (P = 0.364, log-rank test) and CFS was 65% and 79% (P = 0.115, log-rank test) for 5-FU and capecitabine, respectively. GSTT1 and TYMS genotypes were associated with severe (grade 3-4) toxicity. Conclusions: Capecitabine combined with MMC and radiotherapy was equally effective as 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy. This study shows that capecitabine can be used as an acceptable alternative to 5-FU for the treatment of AC.
引用
收藏
页码:1726 / 1733
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Genetic predictors of acute toxicities related to radiation therapy following lumpectomy for breast cancer: a case-series study
    Ambrosone, Christine B.
    Tian, Chunqiao
    Ahn, Jiyoung
    Kropp, Silke
    Helmbold, Irmgard
    von Fournier, Dietrich
    Haase, Wulf
    Sautter-Bihl, Marie Luise
    Wenz, Frederik
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 8 (04)
  • [2] Arnott SJ, 1996, LANCET, V348, P1049
  • [3] DOSE FRACTIONATION, DOSE-RATE AND ISO-EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS FOR NORMAL TISSUE RESPONSES
    BARENDSEN, GW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1982, 8 (11): : 1981 - 1997
  • [4] Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: Results of a phase III randomized trial of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer radiotherapy and gastrointestinal cooperative groups
    Bartelink, H
    Roelofsen, F
    Eschwege, F
    Rougier, P
    Bosset, JF
    Gonzalez, DG
    Peiffert, D
    vanGlabbeke, M
    Pierart, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (05) : 2040 - 2049
  • [5] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal
    Bazan, Jose G.
    Hara, Wendy
    Hsu, Annie
    Kunz, Pamela A.
    Ford, James
    Fisher, George A.
    Welton, Mark L.
    Shelton, Andrew
    Kapp, Daniel S.
    Koong, Albert C.
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    Chang, Daniel T.
    [J]. CANCER, 2011, 117 (15) : 3342 - 3351
  • [6] Simultaneous Integrated Boost-Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With Concomitant Capecitabine and Mitomycin C for Locally Advanced Anal Carcinoma: A Phase 1 Study
    Deenen, Maarten J.
    Dewit, Luc
    Boot, Henk
    Beijnen, Jos H.
    Schellens, Jan H. M.
    Cats, Annemieke
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 85 (05): : E201 - E207
  • [7] Results of definitive irradiation in a series of 305 epidermoid carcinomas of the anal canal
    Deniaud-Alexandre, E
    Touboul, E
    Tiret, E
    Sezeur, A
    Houry, S
    Gallot, D
    Parc, R
    Huang, R
    Qu, SH
    Huart, J
    Pène, F
    Schlienger, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (05): : 1259 - 1273
  • [8] The integration of oral capecitabine into chemoradiation regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: how successful have we been?
    Glynne-Jones, R
    Dunst, J
    Sebag-Montefiore, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (03) : 361 - 371
  • [9] Extra - A multicenter phase II study of chemoradiation using a 5 day per week oral regimen of capecitabine and intravenous mitomycin C in anal cancer
    Glynne-Jones, Rob
    Meadows, Helen
    Wan, Susan
    Gollins, Simon
    Leslie, Martin
    Levine, Ed
    McDonald, Alec C.
    Myint, Sun
    Samuel, Les
    Sebag-Montefiore, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : 119 - 126
  • [10] "MIND THE GAP"-THE IMPACT OF VARIATIONS IN THE DURATION OF THE TREATMENT GAP AND OVERALL TREATMENT TIME IN THE FIRST UK ANAL CANCER TRIAL (ACT I)
    Glynne-Jones, Rob
    Sebag-Montefiore, David
    Adams, Richard
    McDonald, Alec
    Gollins, Simon
    James, Roger
    Northover, John M. A.
    Meadows, Helen M.
    Jitlal, Mark
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (05): : 1488 - 1494