Life Cycle Assessment of bioenergy production from mountainous grasslands invaded by lupine (Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl.)

被引:4
作者
Joseph, Ben [1 ]
Hensgen, Frank [1 ]
Wachendorf, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kassel, Grassland Sci & Renewable Plant Resources, Steinstr 19, D-37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
关键词
Invasive species; Mountainous grassland; Bio energy; Life cycle assessment; DIFFERENT ENERGY RECOVERY; INTEGRATED GENERATION; SOLID-FUEL; BIOMASS IFBB; SEMINATURAL GRASSLAND; BIOGAS; EMISSIONS; DIGESTION; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111182
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mountainous grasslands are typically important habitats both for fauna and flora but increasingly suffer from invasions by neophytes (i.e. Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl.) in most German low mountain areas, which eventually threatens species richness. Regular defoliation is required to eliminate the invasion, however, at present options to handle the harvested biomass are limited. Integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass (IFBB) and anaerobic digestion (AD) are two possible options to utilise the biomass and convert it into energy. There is substantial environmental impact associated with the energy and resource usage during conversion of the biomass into fuel and during usage of fuels and co-products obtained. This study examines IFBB and AD to identify the best option in terms of environmental impacts and primary energy usage, also looking at alternatives for process parameters along the life cycle that would reduce environmental impacts. It was found that IFBB was a better option compared to AD, as it had higher environmental and primary energy savings across all grassland sites. Higher energy conversion efficiency of IFBB resulted in higher greenhouse gas (GHG) and energy savings, even though the energy usage for the processing steps were higher compared to AD. Biomass yield was positively related to the savings, providing better GHG and energy savings for grasslands containing invasive species. There were no savings in terms of acidification (AP) and eutrophication potential (EP) for both IFBB and AD, however AP and EP was lower using IFBB compared to AD. Hence, biomass originating from mountainous grasslands with lupine invasion could be effectively utilised with IFBB, as this option had lower environmental impacts and higher energy savings compared to AD. Biomass from non-invaded grasslands could also be converted effectively using IFBB, hence IFBB could be used to utilise the harvested biomass in the situation where the invasion is eliminated.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Adams P., 2018, GREENHOUSE GAS BALAN, P221
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, THESIS
[3]   Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production [J].
Berglund, M ;
Börjesson, P .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (03) :254-266
[4]   Economic assessment of the integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass (IFBB) in comparison to different energy recovery, animal-based and non-refining management systems [J].
Blumenstein, Benjamin ;
Buehle, Lutz ;
Wachendorf, Michael ;
Moeller, Detlev .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 119 :312-323
[5]  
Broback D., 2015, PREVENTING SPREAD IN
[6]   Life cycle assessment of the integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass (IFBB) in comparison to different energy recovery, animal-based and non-refining management systems [J].
Buehle, Lutz ;
Hensgen, Frank ;
Donnison, Iain ;
Heinsoo, Katrin ;
Wachendorf, Michael .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 111 :230-239
[7]   Comparative life cycle assessment of the integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass (IFBB) and whole crop digestion (WCD) in Germany [J].
Buehle, Lutz ;
Stuelpnagel, R. ;
Wachendorf, M. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (01) :363-373
[8]  
Bui M, 2018, ENERG ENVIRON SCI, V11, P1062, DOI [10.1039/c7ee02342a, 10.1039/C7EE02342A]
[9]  
Bundesministerium fur Umwelt Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, 2002, 1 ALLG VERW BUND IMM
[10]   Seasonal energy storage using bioenergy production from abandoned croplands [J].
Campbell, J. Elliott ;
Lobell, David B. ;
Genova, Robert C. ;
Zumkehr, Andrew ;
Field, Christopher B. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (03)