Integrated phenotypes: understanding trait covariation in plants and animals

被引:220
作者
Armbruster, W. Scott [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pelabon, Christophe [4 ]
Bolstad, Geir H. [4 ]
Hansen, Thomas F. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Biol Sci, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, Hants, England
[2] Univ Alaska, Inst Arctic Biol, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Biol, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[4] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Biol, Ctr Biodivers Dynam, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[5] Univ Oslo, Dept Biol, Ctr Ecol & Evolutionary Synth, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
integration; modularity; variation; phenotype; MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGRATION; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; DEVELOPMENTAL INTEGRATION; MORPHOMETRIC INTEGRATION; FUNCTIONAL-INTEGRATION; DIFFERENTIAL EPISTASIS; DALECHAMPIA BLOSSOMS; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; VEGETATIVE TRAITS; STATIC ALLOMETRY;
D O I
10.1098/rstb.2013.0245
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Integration and modularity refer to the patterns and processes of trait interaction and independence. Both terms have complex histories with respect to both conceptualization and quantification, resulting in a plethora of integration indices in use. We review briefly the divergent definitions, uses and measures of integration and modularity and make conceptual links to allometry. We also discuss how integration and modularity might evolve. Although integration is generally thought to be generated and maintained by correlational selection, theoretical considerations suggest the relationship is not straightforward. We caution here against uncontrolled comparisons of indices across studies. In the absence of controls for trait number, dimensionality, homology, development and function, it is difficult, or even impossible, to compare integration indices across organisms or traits. We suggest that care be invested in relating measurement to underlying theory or hypotheses, and that summative, theory-free descriptors of integration generally be avoided. The papers that follow in this Theme Issue illustrate the diversity of approaches to studying integration and modularity, highlighting strengths and pitfalls that await researchers investigating integration in plants and animals.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 208 条
[1]   How much do genetic covariances alter the rate of adaptation? [J].
Agrawal, Aneil F. ;
Stinchcombe, John R. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 276 (1659) :1183-1191
[2]   Integration and evolution of the cichlid mandible: The molecular basis of alternate feeding strategies [J].
Albertson, RC ;
Streelman, JT ;
Kocher, TD ;
Yelick, PC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (45) :16287-16292
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, The Origins of Genome Architecture
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1872, The origin of species
[5]  
[Anonymous], Scaling: Why is Animal Size So Important?
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Homology, genes, and evolutionary innovation
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Wiley Series in Mathematical and Computational Biology
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2002, The structure of evolutionary theory, DOI [DOI 10.4159/9780674417922, 10.4159/9780674417922]
[9]   Floral specialization and angiosperm diversity: phenotypic divergence, fitness trade-offs and realized pollination accuracy [J].
Armbruster, W. Scott .
AOB PLANTS, 2014, 6
[10]   The adaptive accuracy of flowers: measurement and microevolutionary patterns [J].
Armbruster, W. Scott ;
Hansen, Thomas F. ;
Pelabon, Christophe ;
Perez-Barrales, Rocio ;
Maad, Johanne .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2009, 103 (09) :1529-1545