Objective and subjective measures of cross-situational learning

被引:3
|
作者
Franco, Ana [1 ]
Cleeremans, Axel [1 ]
Destrebecqz, Arnaud [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Ctr Res Cognit & Neurosci, 50 Ave FD Roosevelt, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Cross-situational learning; Statistical leaming; Process Dissociation Procedure; Awareness; IMPLICIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.02.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Statistical learning is often considered to be automatic and implicit, but little is known about the extent to which the resulting representations are available to conscious awareness. In the present study, we focus on whether the knowledge acquired in statistical learning of word-referent pairs is available to conscious control. Using a cross-situational learning paradigm, adult participants were first exposed to a set of pictures associated with auditorily presented words. Immediately thereafter, they were exposed to a second set of word-picture pairs. After the exposure phase, learning and conscious accessibility to the acquired knowledge were measured by using an adaptation of the Process Dissociation Procedure (Jacoby, 1991): two recognition tasks that only differed by instructions. In the Inclusion task, participants were instructed to accept all the correct associations (either from the first or the second set) and reject all the incorrect associations. In the Exclusion task, they had to accept all the correct associations from one of the sets and reject both the correct associations from the other set as well as all incorrect associations. Moreover, binary confidence judgments were recorded after each trial. Results show that participants were able to control the acquired knowledge. However, confidence judgments revealed that participants correctly identified the learned associations even when they claimed to guess, suggesting that cross-situational learning involves a mixture of both conscious and unconscious influences. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 23
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Detailed Behavioral Analysis as a Window Into Cross-Situational Word Learning
    Suanda, Sumarga H.
    Namy, Laura L.
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2012, 36 (03) : 545 - 559
  • [22] Cross-Situational Learning of Phonologically Overlapping Words Across Degrees of Ambiguity
    Mulak, Karen E.
    Vlach, Haley A.
    Escudero, Paola
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2019, 43 (05)
  • [23] Cross-situational Word Learning is Better Modeled by Associations than Hypotheses
    Kachergis, George
    Yu, Chen
    Shiffrin, Richard M.
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING AND EPIGENETIC ROBOTICS (ICDL), 2012,
  • [24] Infants Encode Phonetic Detail during Cross-Situational Word Learning
    Escudero, Paola
    Mulak, Karen E.
    Vlach, Haley A.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [25] WORD AND CATEGORY LEARNING IN A CONTINUOUS SEMANTIC DOMAIN: COMPARING CROSS-SITUATIONAL AND INTERACTIVE LEARNING
    Belpaeme, Tony
    Morse, Anthony
    ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS, 2012, 15 (3-4):
  • [26] Cross-Situational Learning with Bayesian Generative Models for Multimodal Category and Word Learning in Robots
    Taniguchi, Akira
    Taniguchi, Tadahiro
    Cangelosi, Angelo
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROROBOTICS, 2017, 11
  • [27] Gavagai Is as Gavagai Does: Learning Nouns and Verbs From Cross-Situational Statistics
    Monaghan, Padraic
    Mattock, Karen
    Davies, Robert A. I.
    Smith, Alastair C.
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2015, 39 (05) : 1099 - 1112
  • [28] Developmental Changes in Cross-Situational Word Learning: The Inverse Effect of Initial Accuracy
    Fitneva, Stanka A.
    Christiansen, Morten H.
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2017, 41 : 141 - 161
  • [29] Cross-situational and ostensive word learning in children with and without autism spectrum disorder
    Venker, Courtney E.
    COGNITION, 2019, 183 : 181 - 191
  • [30] Pragmatically Framed Cross-Situational Noun Learning Using Computational Reinforcement Models
    Najnin, Shamima
    Banerjee, Bonny
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9