Soil pH and cation exchange capacity affects sunflower tolerance to sulfentrazone

被引:18
|
作者
Kerr, GW
Stahlman, PW
Dille, JA
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Agr Res Ctr Hays, Hays, KS 67601 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agron, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
关键词
bioactivity; chlorosis; crop injury; soil factors;
D O I
10.1614/WT-03-025R
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Effects of soil pH and cation exchange capacity (CEC) on sunflower tolerance to sulfentrazone were investigated in a greenhouse study. Variables were soil pH (7.0, 7.3, 7.5, and 7.8), soil CEC (8.2, 13.7, 18.4, and 23.3 cmol/kg), and sulfentrazone rate (0, 105, 158, and 184 g ai/ha). Sulfentrazone-induced leaf chlorosis was affected by soil pH at 12 d after planting (DAP), but plants recovered, and earlier differences were not visible 9 d later. At 12 DAP, leaf chlorosis was 3 or 4% more severe in soils with pH 7.3 or higher compared with soils with pH 7.0 when averaged over both sulfentrazone rate and soil CEC. Leaf chlorosis resulting from sulfentrazone rates of 105, 158, and 184 g/ha was 17, 25, and 35% less at 23 cmol/kg than at 8.2 cmol/kg, respectively. Differences in chlorosis among, sulfentrazone rates were greatest in soil with low CEC and lessened as soil CEC increased. Plants regained normal color over time, and newly emerging leaves were not affected. However, plant dry weights were reduced when sulfentrazone rate was greater than or equal to158 g/ha. Averaged over sulfentrazone rate and soil pH, sunflower dry weights were less when soil CEC was 8.2 compared with a CEC of 13.7 cmol/kg or higher, indicating a greater response at low CEC. Sunflower plant dry matter was not different in sulfentrazone-treated soil with a CEC above 13.7 cmol/kg. At the ranges tested, soil CEC had a considerably greater effect than did pH on sunflower tolerance to sulfentrazone.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 247
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFECT OF SAMPLE PREPARATION AND PH ON THE CATION-EXCHANGE CAPACITY OF THATCH
    DANNEBERGER, TK
    TURGEON, AJ
    PECK, TR
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1984, 76 (01) : 155 - 156
  • [32] CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY
    VOSS, RD
    CROPS AND SOILS MAGAZINE, 1971, 24 (03): : 12 - &
  • [33] Predicting cation exchange capacity for soil survey using linear models
    Seybold, CA
    Grossman, RB
    Reinsch, TG
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2005, 69 (03) : 856 - 863
  • [34] Rapid estimation of cation exchange capacity from soil water content
    Arthur, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2017, 68 (03) : 365 - 373
  • [35] Prediction of Soil Cation Exchange Capacity Using Different Soil Parameters by Intelligent Models
    Jalali, Seyed Alireza Seyed
    Navidi, Mir Naser
    Mohammadi, Javad Seyed
    Meymand, Ali Zeinadini
    Esmail, Zahra Mohammad
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2019, 50 (17) : 2123 - 2139
  • [36] Modeling soil cation exchange capacity using soil parameters: Assessing the heuristic models
    Shiri, Jalal
    Keshavarzi, Ali
    Kisi, Ozgur
    Iturraran-Viveros, Ursula
    Bagherzadeh, Ali
    Mousavi, Rouhollah
    Karimi, Sepideh
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2017, 135 : 242 - 251
  • [37] Cation exchange capacity and composition of soluble soil organic matter fractions
    Kaiser, M.
    Ellerbrock, R. H.
    Gerke, H. H.
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2008, 72 (05) : 1278 - 1285
  • [38] EFFECT OF SOIL CATION-EXCHANGE CAPACITY ON THE UPTAKE OF CADMIUM BY CORN
    HINESLY, TD
    REDBORG, KE
    ZIEGLER, EL
    ALEXANDER, JD
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1982, 46 (03) : 490 - 497
  • [39] Iron reduction and changes in cation exchange capacity in intermittently waterlogged soil
    Favre, F
    Tessier, D
    Abdelmoula, M
    Génin, JM
    Gates, WP
    Boivin, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2002, 53 (02) : 175 - 183
  • [40] Potassium fertilization in flooded rice according to soil cation exchange capacity
    Anghinoni, Ibanor
    Carmona, Felipe de Campos
    Genro Junior, Silvio Aymone
    Boeni, Madalena
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2013, 48 (11) : 1481 - 1488