Validation of the health literacy scale for diabetes as a criterion-referenced test with standard setting procedures

被引:5
作者
Kang, Soo Jin [1 ]
Sim, Kang Hee [2 ]
Song, Bok Rye [3 ]
Park, Jeong-Eun [4 ,5 ]
Chang, Soo Jung [6 ]
Park, Chanho [7 ]
Lee, Mi Sook [8 ]
机构
[1] Daegu Univ, Dept Nursing, Daegu, South Korea
[2] Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Diabet Educ, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Diabet Educ, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Dankook Univ, Coll Med, Cheil Gen Hosp, Dept Nursing, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Dankook Univ, Coll Med, Womens Healthcare Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Woosuk Univ, Dept Nursing, Jeollabuk Do, South Korea
[7] Keimyung Univ, Dept Educ, Daegu, South Korea
[8] Daegu Univ, Dept Psychol, Seongdang Ro 50 Gil, Daegu 42400, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Bookmark method; Cutoff score; Diabetes; Health literacy; Item response theory; Jaeger's method; Standard setting; ASSOCIATION; CARE; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.013
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop and examine the psychometric properties of the Korean Health Literacy Scale for Diabetes Mellitus (KHLS-DM), and to establish reasonable cutoff scores. Methods: Initially, 299 items were generated to measure diabetes-related words, numeracy, and information utilization. Content validity assessment and preliminary tests were conducted. After exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Rasch analysis, the remaining 65 items were administered to a quota sample of 500 diabetic patients aged 40-74 years. The items were narrowed down to 58 items based on an item fit index. To obtain cutoff scores, Jaeger's method and the Bookmark method were employed. Results: A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed, and a three-factor model was supported (chi(2)/df = 3.891, CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.04). The overall scores ranged from 0 to 58, and two cutoff points were established. The scale exhibited good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83). Conclusions: The KHLS-DM is a reliable and valid measure with cutoff points to classify individuals into three groups (adequate, marginal, and inadequate). Practice implications: The standard setting may be useful for researchers to validate health literacy measures in other countries and populations. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1468 / 1476
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Health Literacy and Health Outcomes in Diabetes: A Systematic Review [J].
Al Sayah, Fatima ;
Majumdar, Sumit R. ;
Williams, Beverly ;
Robertson, Sandy ;
Johnson, Jeffrey A. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 (03) :444-452
[2]   Measuring Health Literacy in Individuals With Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Evaluation of Available Measures [J].
Al Sayah, Fatima ;
Williams, Beverly ;
Johnson, Jeffrey A. .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2013, 40 (01) :42-55
[3]   The evolution of health literacy assessment tools: a systematic review [J].
Altin, Sibel Vildan ;
Finke, Isabelle ;
Kautz-Freimuth, Sibylle ;
Stock, Stephanie .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
[4]   AADE7™ self-care behaviors [J].
不详 .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2008, 34 (03) :445-449
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, HLTH LITERACY PRESCR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Diabetes ATLAS, V6th
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, DIAB FACT SHEET KOR
[8]   Update on Health Literacy and Diabetes [J].
Bailey, Stacy Cooper ;
Brega, Angela G. ;
Crutchfield, Trisha M. ;
Elasy, Tom ;
Herr, Haley ;
Kaphingst, Kimberly ;
Karter, Andrew J. ;
Moreland-Russell, Sarah ;
Osborn, Chandra Y. ;
Pignone, Michael ;
Rothman, Russell ;
Schillinger, Dean .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2014, 40 (05) :581-604
[9]   The meaning and the measure of health literacy [J].
Baker, David W. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 21 (08) :878-883
[10]   Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy [J].
Baker, DW ;
Williams, MV ;
Parker, RM ;
Gazmararian, JA ;
Nurss, J .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1999, 38 (01) :33-42