Bending Resistance and Dynamic and Static Cyclic Fatigue Life of Reciproc and WaveOne Large Instruments

被引:55
作者
De-Deus, Gustavo [1 ]
Leal Vieira, Victor Talarico [1 ]
Nogueira da Silva, Emmanuel Joao [1 ]
Lopes, Helio [2 ]
Elias, Carlos Nelson [3 ]
Moreira, Edson Jorge [1 ]
机构
[1] Grande Rio Univ UNIGRANRIO, Dept Endodontol, Duque De Caxias, RJ, Brazil
[2] Estacio Sa Univ UNESA, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Mil Inst Engn, Biomat Lab, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
Cyclic fatigue; instruments; NiTi; Reciproc; reciprocating movement; WaveOne; TITANIUM ROTARY INSTRUMENTS; ENDODONTIC INSTRUMENTS; APICAL ENLARGEMENT; CANAL PREPARATION; ROOT CANALS; FILES; PROTAPER; CURVATURE; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.013
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the bending resistance and the dynamic and static cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc R40 and WaveOne large in- struments. Methods: A sample of 68 nickel-titanium instruments (25 mm in length) for use under reciprocation movement (Reciproc and WaveOne) from 3 different lots was tested. Reciproc R40 and WaveOne Large files, both of which had a nominal size of 0.40 mm at DO, were selected. The bending resistance was performed in 10 instruments of each system by using a universal testing machine. Dynamic and static models for cyclic fatigue testing were performed by using a custom-made device. For these tests, an artificial canal measuring 1.4 mm in diameter and 19 mm total length was fabricated from a stainless steel tube. Scanning electron microscopy analysis was performed to determine the mode of fracture. Statistical analysis was performed by using parametric methods, 1-way analysis of variance. Post hoc pair-wise comparisons were performed by using Tukey test for multiple comparisons. Results: WaveOne instruments presented significantly higher bending resistance than Reciproc (P <.05). Moreover, Reciproc revealed a significantly longer cyclic fatigue life (P <.05) in both static and dynamic tests (P <.05). Conclusions: Reciproc R40 instruments resisted dynamic and static cyclic fatigue significantly more than WaveOne Large instruments. Furthermore, WaveOne instruments presented significantly less flexibility than Reciproc.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 579
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]  
Serene TP AJ., 1995, Nickel-titanium instruments: applications in endodontics
[22]  
Souza-Filho FJ, 1987, ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, V64, P480
[23]   Effect of cyclic fatigue on static fracture loads in ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments [J].
Ullmann, CJ ;
Peters, OA .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2005, 31 (03) :183-186
[24]   A comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance in reciprocating and rotary nickel-titanium instruments [J].
Wan, Jeffrey ;
Rasimick, Brian J. ;
Musikant, Barry L. ;
Deutsch, Allan S. .
AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2011, 37 (03) :122-127
[25]   Cyclic fatigue of three types of rotary nickel-titanium files in a dynamic model [J].
Yao, JH ;
Schwartz, SA ;
Beeson, TJ .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2006, 32 (01) :55-57
[26]   Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations [J].
Yared, G. .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2008, 41 (04) :339-344
[27]   INFLUENCE OF APICAL ENLARGEMENT ON BACTERIAL-INFECTION DURING TREATMENT OF APICAL PERIODONTITIS [J].
YARED, GM ;
DAGHER, FEB .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1994, 20 (11) :535-537
[28]   Lifespan of One Nickel-Titanium Rotary File with Reciprocating Motion in Curved Root Canals [J].
You, Sung-Yeop ;
Bae, Kwang-Shik ;
Baek, Seung-Ho ;
Kum, Kee-Yeon ;
Shon, Won-Jun ;
Lee, WooCheol .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2010, 36 (12) :1991-1994
[29]   The effect of rotational speed and the curvature of root canals on the breakage of rotary endodontic instruments [J].
Zelada, G ;
Varela, P ;
Martín, B ;
Bahíllo, JG ;
Magán, F ;
Ahn , S .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2002, 28 (07) :540-542
[30]   Influence of Cross-sectional Design and Dimension on Mechanical Behavior of Nickel-Titanium Instruments under Torsion and Bending: A Numerical Analysis [J].
Zhang, En-Wei ;
Cheung, Gary S. P. ;
Zheng, Yu-Feng .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2010, 36 (08) :1394-1398