Generic interrelationships within the spionidae (Annelida: Polychaeta)

被引:42
作者
Sigvaldadottir, E
Mackie, ASY
Pleijel, F
机构
[1] UNIV STOCKHOLM,DEPT ZOOL,S-10691 STOCKHOLM,SWEDEN
[2] NATL MUSEUM WALES,DEPT ZOOL,CARDIFF CF1 3NP,S GLAM,WALES
关键词
cladistics; systematics; parsimony;
D O I
10.1111/j.1096-3642.1997.tb00144.x
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The phylogenetic relationships of spionid genera are estimated from parsimony analyses of morphological characters, with Trochochaetidae, Poecilochaetidae and Uncispionidae as outgroups. A first analysis of currently recognised genera proved inconclusive and even exclusion of six of the most polymorphic genera resulted in 13 305 equally parsimonious trees and a fully collapsed consensus tree. A second analysis using only the type species of each genus, yielded four equally parsimonious trees; reduced to two after successive weighting. The topologies of these two trees indicated division of the family into four main groups: (1) Aonidella and Xandaros; (2) Prionospio (sensu lato)-complex, Laonice, Spiophanes and Aonides; (3) a large assemblage of genera, including Polydora-(sensu lato), Scolelepis, Malacoceros and Spio; (4) Atherospio, Pseudatherospio and Pygospiopsis. Earlier literature classifications of the group are evaluated and compared with the new results. (C) 1997 The Linnean Society of London.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 500
页数:28
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution
[2]  
Audouin J. V, 1833, ANN SCI NATURELLES P, V28, P187, DOI [10.5962/bhl.part.8010, DOI 10.5962/BHL.PART.8010]
[3]  
Augener H., 1914, FAUNA SUDWEST AUST, V5, P1
[4]  
Blake J.A., 1983, Antarctic Research Series, V39, P205
[5]  
BLAKE JA, 1992, P BIOL SOC WASH, V105, P723
[6]  
BLAKE JA, 1979, AM ZOOL, V19, P887
[7]  
Blake JA., 1978, MEM NAT MUS VICTORIA, V39, P171
[8]  
BLAKE JA, 1987, B BIOL SOC WASH, V7, P11
[9]  
BLAKE NJM, 1983, THESIS BOSTON U
[10]  
BOSC LAG, 1902, HIST NATURELLE VERS