Revealing Community Perceptions for Ecological Restoration Using a Soft System Methodology

被引:10
作者
Nguyen, Tanh T. N. [1 ]
Scognamillo, Daniel G. [2 ]
Comer, Christopher E. [2 ]
机构
[1] An Giang Univ, Coll Engn Technol & Environm, 18 Ung Van Khiem St, Long Xuyen, An Giang, Vietnam
[2] Stephen F Austin State Univ, Arthur Temple Coll Forestry & Agr, 419 East Coll St,POB 6109, Nacogdoches, TX 75962 USA
关键词
Soft systems methodology; Ecological restoration; Community perceptions; Black bear restoration; Probability success; CONCEPTUAL-MODEL; BLACK BEAR; MANAGEMENT; THINKING; STAKEHOLDERS;
D O I
10.1007/s11213-018-9463-x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Human perceptions under unstructured forms contain valuable information for ecological restoration (ER). To aid in ER, this paper introduces a working process to analyze the unstructured information for the case study of black bear restoration (BBR) in East Texas where understanding of the perceptions of stakeholders at a community level is needed. We identified the current situation, revealed stakeholders and their interactions, and developed actions for change for BBR. Our techniques included recording discussions in meetings, Soft Systems Methodology, and stakeholder analysis. Results indicated the current situation of BBR with human-bear and human-human conflicts. We figured out that information exchange was interrupted in the public, a potential cause for conflicts. Through a systemization, results showed various roles of key stakeholders and constraints for BBR. We found that local state agencies and local residents (particularly landowners) are the key decision-makers for BBR success. Their collaboration can result in a small portion of success (1/9) that can be increased by more cooperation. The SSM framework introduced in this study can be used for modeling community perceptions in ecological restoration.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 442
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Problem structuring in participatory forest planning
    Khadka, Chiranjeewee
    Hujala, Teppo
    Wolfslehner, Bernhard
    Vacik, Harald
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 26 : 1 - 11
  • [22] Kristiansen MB, 2017, ADM SOC
  • [23] Maltby E., 2006, Application of the Ecosystem Approach to strategic wetland management in Vietnam's Mekong Delta, Darwin Initiative, England
  • [24] Morrison ML, 2015, WILDL MANAGE CONSERV, P1
  • [25] Nepstad DanielC., 2005, Conserving Biodiversity, P37
  • [26] Modelling decision-making regarding wetland services for wetland management in Tram Chim National Park, Vietnam
    Nguyen, Tanh T. N.
    Evans, Edward A.
    Migliaccio, Kati W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2016, 5 (01) : 28 - 48
  • [27] Strategic Management Research in the Public Sector: A Review, Synthesis, and Future Directions
    Poister, Theodore H.
    Pitts, David W.
    Edwards, Lauren Hamilton
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2010, 40 (05) : 522 - 545
  • [28] Detecting critical choke points for achieving Good Environmental Status in European seas
    Potts, Tavis
    O'Higgins, Tim
    Brennan, Ruth
    Cinnirella, Sergio
    Brandt, Urs Steiner
    Suarez de Vivero, Juan Luis
    van Beusekom, Justus
    Troost, Tineke A.
    Paltriguera, Lucille
    Hosgor, Ayse Gunduz
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):
  • [29] Rico A, 2006, BIENN M SCAND SOC FO, P313
  • [30] Roling NielsG., 2000, Facilitating sustainable agriculture: participatory learning and adaptive management in times of environmental uncertainty