Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images

被引:42
作者
Correa, Leticia Ruhland [1 ]
Spin-Neto, Rubens [2 ]
Stavropoulos, Andreas [3 ,4 ]
Schropp, Lars [5 ]
Dias da Silveira, Heloisa Emilia [1 ]
Wenzel, Ann
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Dent Oral Radiol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Dent Oral Radiol, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Dent Periodontol, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] CEPBR, Athens, Greece
[5] Aarhus Univ, Dept Dent Prosthet Dent, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
cone beam computed tomography; digital panoramic radiography; implant planning; implant size; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CONE-BEAM; MAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY; ACCURACY; CT; DOSIMETRY; SELECTION; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1111/clr.12126
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo compare the implant size (width and length) planned with digital panoramic radiographs, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-generated panoramic views, or CBCT cross-sectional images, in four implant systems. Material and methodsSeventy-one patients with a total of 103 implant sites in the upper premolar and/or lower molar regions were examined with digital panoramic radiography (D-PAN) and (CBCT). A metal ball 5mm in diameter was placed in the edentulous area for the D-PAN. CBCT data sets were reformatted to a 10-mm thick CBCT panoramic view (CBCT-pan) and 1-mm cross-sections (CBCT-cross). Measurements were performed in the images using dedicated software. All images were displayed on a monitor and assessed by three observers who outlined a dental implant by placing four reference points in the site of the implant-to-be. Differences in width and length of the implant-to-be from the three modalities were analyzed. The implant size selected in the CBCT-cross images was then compared to that selected in the other two modalities (D-PAN and CBCT-pan) for each of the implant systems separately. ResultsThe implant-to-be (average measurements among observers) was narrower when measured in CBCT-cross compared with both D-PAN and CBCT-Pan. For premolar sites, the width also differed significantly between D-PAN and CBCT-pan modalities. The implant-to-be was also significantly shorter when recorded in CBCT-cross than in D-PAN. In premolar sites, there were no significant differences in implant length among the three image modalities. It mattered very little for the change in implant step sizes whether CBCT-cross was compared to D-PAN or CBCT-pan images. ConclusionOur results show that the selected implant size differs when planned on panoramic or cross-section CBCT images. In most cases, implant size measured in cross-section images was narrower and shorter than implant size measured in a panoramic image or CBCT-based panoramic view.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 695
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment
    Angelopoulos, Christos
    Thomas, Stephen
    Hechler, Stephen
    Parissis, Nikos
    Hlavacek, Matt
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 66 (10) : 2130 - 2135
  • [2] Bamgbose B O, 2008, Nig Q J Hosp Med, V18, P32
  • [3] Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography
    Chau, Anson C. M.
    Fung, Karl
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2009, 107 (04): : 559 - 565
  • [4] Curry T. S., 1984, ANONYMOUS CHRISTENSE, P243
  • [5] Changes in the pre-surgical treatment planning using conventional spiral tomography
    Diniz, Ana Flavia N.
    Mendonca, Elismauro F.
    Leles, Claudio R.
    Guilherme, Aderico S.
    Cavalcante, Marcelo P.
    Silva, Maria Alves G. S.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (03) : 249 - 253
  • [6] Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry
    Frei, C
    Buser, D
    Dula, K
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (04) : 490 - 497
  • [7] THE EFFICACY OF DIAGNOSTIC-IMAGING
    FRYBACK, DG
    THORNBURY, JR
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1991, 11 (02) : 88 - 94
  • [8] Development of a system for craniofacial analysis from monitor-displayed digital images
    Gotfredsen, E
    Kragskov, J
    Wenzel, A
    [J]. DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (02) : 123 - 126
  • [9] Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device:: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD
    Lofthag-Flansen, S.
    Thilander-Mang, A.
    Ekestubbe, A.
    Helmrot, E.
    Grondahl, K.
    [J]. DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 37 (02) : 72 - 79
  • [10] Cone-Beam CT for Preoperative Implant Planning in the Posterior Mandible: Visibility of Anatomic Landmarks
    Lofthag-Hansen, Sara
    Groendahl, Kerstin
    Ekestubbe, Annika
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (03) : 246 - 255