Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images

被引:45
作者
Correa, Leticia Ruhland [1 ]
Spin-Neto, Rubens [2 ]
Stavropoulos, Andreas [3 ,4 ]
Schropp, Lars [5 ]
Dias da Silveira, Heloisa Emilia [1 ]
Wenzel, Ann
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Dent Oral Radiol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Dent Oral Radiol, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Dent Periodontol, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] CEPBR, Athens, Greece
[5] Aarhus Univ, Dept Dent Prosthet Dent, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
cone beam computed tomography; digital panoramic radiography; implant planning; implant size; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CONE-BEAM; MAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY; ACCURACY; CT; DOSIMETRY; SELECTION; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1111/clr.12126
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo compare the implant size (width and length) planned with digital panoramic radiographs, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-generated panoramic views, or CBCT cross-sectional images, in four implant systems. Material and methodsSeventy-one patients with a total of 103 implant sites in the upper premolar and/or lower molar regions were examined with digital panoramic radiography (D-PAN) and (CBCT). A metal ball 5mm in diameter was placed in the edentulous area for the D-PAN. CBCT data sets were reformatted to a 10-mm thick CBCT panoramic view (CBCT-pan) and 1-mm cross-sections (CBCT-cross). Measurements were performed in the images using dedicated software. All images were displayed on a monitor and assessed by three observers who outlined a dental implant by placing four reference points in the site of the implant-to-be. Differences in width and length of the implant-to-be from the three modalities were analyzed. The implant size selected in the CBCT-cross images was then compared to that selected in the other two modalities (D-PAN and CBCT-pan) for each of the implant systems separately. ResultsThe implant-to-be (average measurements among observers) was narrower when measured in CBCT-cross compared with both D-PAN and CBCT-Pan. For premolar sites, the width also differed significantly between D-PAN and CBCT-pan modalities. The implant-to-be was also significantly shorter when recorded in CBCT-cross than in D-PAN. In premolar sites, there were no significant differences in implant length among the three image modalities. It mattered very little for the change in implant step sizes whether CBCT-cross was compared to D-PAN or CBCT-pan images. ConclusionOur results show that the selected implant size differs when planned on panoramic or cross-section CBCT images. In most cases, implant size measured in cross-section images was narrower and shorter than implant size measured in a panoramic image or CBCT-based panoramic view.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 695
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment [J].
Angelopoulos, Christos ;
Thomas, Stephen ;
Hechler, Stephen ;
Parissis, Nikos ;
Hlavacek, Matt .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 66 (10) :2130-2135
[2]  
Bamgbose B O, 2008, Nig Q J Hosp Med, V18, P32
[3]   Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography [J].
Chau, Anson C. M. ;
Fung, Karl .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2009, 107 (04) :559-565
[4]  
Curry T. S., 1984, ANONYMOUS CHRISTENSE, P243
[5]   Changes in the pre-surgical treatment planning using conventional spiral tomography [J].
Diniz, Ana Flavia N. ;
Mendonca, Elismauro F. ;
Leles, Claudio R. ;
Guilherme, Aderico S. ;
Cavalcante, Marcelo P. ;
Silva, Maria Alves G. S. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (03) :249-253
[6]   Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry [J].
Frei, C ;
Buser, D ;
Dula, K .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (04) :490-497
[7]   THE EFFICACY OF DIAGNOSTIC-IMAGING [J].
FRYBACK, DG ;
THORNBURY, JR .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1991, 11 (02) :88-94
[8]   Development of a system for craniofacial analysis from monitor-displayed digital images [J].
Gotfredsen, E ;
Kragskov, J ;
Wenzel, A .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (02) :123-126
[9]   Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device:: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD [J].
Lofthag-Flansen, S. ;
Thilander-Mang, A. ;
Ekestubbe, A. ;
Helmrot, E. ;
Grondahl, K. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 37 (02) :72-79
[10]   Cone-Beam CT for Preoperative Implant Planning in the Posterior Mandible: Visibility of Anatomic Landmarks [J].
Lofthag-Hansen, Sara ;
Groendahl, Kerstin ;
Ekestubbe, Annika .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (03) :246-255