A Threshold of Meaning for Work Disability Improvement in Psoriatic Arthritis Measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire

被引:31
|
作者
Tillett, William [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Chen-Yen [3 ]
Zbrozek, Art [3 ]
Sprabery, Aubrey Trevelin [3 ]
Birt, Julie [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Hosp Rheumat Dis, Dept Rheumatol, Bath, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bath, Dept Pharm & Pharmacol, Bath, Avon, England
[3] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
Biologic naive; Psoriatic arthritis; TNFi experienced; Work productivity; WPAI; HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; INADEQUATE RESPONSE; OF-LIFE; IXEKIZUMAB; COSTS;
D O I
10.1007/s40744-019-0155-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) is used to assess the impact of an intervention on work productivity in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Unfortunately, studies reporting changes or improvements in domains of WPAI:SHP by patients with PsA have a limited threshold of meaning due to the absence of published minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). Our objective was to determine the MCIDs for improvement in WPAI:SHP in patients with active PsA. Methods MCIDs for WPAI:SHP domains (presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment) were derived for patients with active PsA who were biologic naive or TNF inhibitor (TNFi) experienced using 24-week results from two phase 3 trials (SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2). MCIDs were derived using the anchor-based method supplemented by the distribution-based method. Anchors included achievement of the American College of Rheumatology 20 responder index (ACR20), the minimal disease activity (MDA), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire and Disability Index (HAQ-DI) MCID (improvement >= 0.35). Anchor validity was assessed by biserial correlation and analysis of covariance modeling against the domains. MCIDs were triangulated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method supplemented by the distribution-based method. Results The analyses included 417 biologic-naive and 363 TNFi-experienced patients. ACR20, MDA, and HAQ-DI were valid anchors. Significant differences in WPAI:SHP domain scores were observed between patients achieving ACR20, MDA, or HAQ-DI compared to patients not achieving these clinical thresholds (all P < 0.001). ROC analyses suggested that a >= 20% improvement in presenteeism, a 15% improvement in work productivity loss, and a 20% improvement in activity impairment represented clinically meaningful improvements in both populations. The distribution-based method supported the results. Conclusion MCIDs for the presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment domains were estimated to be 20%, 15%, and 20%, respectively, in biologic-naive or TNFi-experienced PsA populations. These results will help improve the meaningfulness of WPAI:SHP improvements reported by PsA patients. Funding Eli Lilly and Company.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 391
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Threshold of Meaning for Work Disability Improvement in Psoriatic Arthritis Measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire
    William Tillett
    Chen-Yen Lin
    Art Zbrozek
    Aubrey Trevelin Sprabery
    Julie Birt
    Rheumatology and Therapy, 2019, 6 : 379 - 391
  • [2] Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire in ankylosing spondylitis
    Reilly, Margaret C.
    Gooch, Katherine L.
    Wong, Robert L.
    Kupper, Hartmut
    van der Heijde, Desiree
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 49 (04) : 812 - 819
  • [3] Validity of the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire - general health version in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
    Zhang, Wei
    Bansback, Nick
    Boonen, Annelies
    Young, Adam
    Singh, Amitabh
    Anis, Aslam H.
    ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2010, 12 (05)
  • [4] Clinically meaningful improvement in work productivity loss in active psoriatic arthritis: post-hoc analysis of SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2 trials
    Tillett, W.
    Lin, C-Y
    Sprabery, A. T.
    Birt, J. A.
    Kavanaugh, A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 38 (06) : 1227 - 1230
  • [5] Real-World Postmarketing Study of the Impact of Adalimumab Treatment on Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis
    Nakagawa, Hidemi
    Tanaka, Yoshiya
    Sano, Shigetoshi
    Kameda, Hideto
    Taniguchi, Atsuo
    Kashiwagi, Tomoko
    Kawaberi, Takeshi
    Kimura, Junko
    Morita, Akimichi
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2019, 36 (03) : 691 - 707
  • [6] Real-World Postmarketing Study of the Impact of Adalimumab Treatment on Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis
    Hidemi Nakagawa
    Yoshiya Tanaka
    Shigetoshi Sano
    Hideto Kameda
    Atsuo Taniguchi
    Tomoko Kashiwagi
    Takeshi Kawaberi
    Junko Kimura
    Akimichi Morita
    Advances in Therapy, 2019, 36 : 691 - 707
  • [7] Work disability in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review
    Tillett, William
    de-Vries, Corinne
    McHugh, Neil J.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2012, 51 (02) : 275 - 283
  • [8] Work Productivity Loss and Fatigue in Psoriatic Arthritis
    Walsh, Jessica A.
    McFadden, Molly L.
    Morgan, Michael D.
    Sawitzke, Allen D.
    Duffin, Kristina Callis
    Krueger, Gerald G.
    Clegg, Daniel O.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 41 (08) : 1670 - 1674
  • [9] Validation of the Persian work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire in asthmatic patients
    Seyedrezazadeh, Ensiyeh
    Ansarin, Khalil
    Sharifi, Akbar
    Rouhi, Amir Hossein Jafari
    Gilani, Neda
    Aftabi, Younes
    Khalili, Majid
    Najmi, Mehdi
    EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 14 (07) : 757 - 762
  • [10] Work productivity and activity impairment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis: a comparative analysis from the POLNOR-Rheuma cohort
    Piotr Kuszmiersz
    Zofia Guła
    Magdalena Strach
    Jarosław Nowakowski
    Grzegorz Biedroń
    Alen Brkic
    Glenn Haugeberg
    Mariusz Korkosz
    Rheumatology International, 45 (5) : 96