Clinical Application of a Hybrid RapidArc Radiotherapy Technique for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer

被引:8
作者
Silva, Scott R. [1 ]
Surucu, Murat [1 ]
Steber, Jennifer [1 ]
Harkenrider, Matthew M. [1 ]
Choi, Mehee [1 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ, Stritch Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Ctr, 2160 S 1st Ave, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
关键词
hybrid RapidArc; 3D conformal radiotherapy; locally advanced lung cancer; radiation toxicity; radiation pneumonitis; radiation esophagitis; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; PATIENT DATA METAANALYSIS; CHEMORADIATION THERAPY; VMAT TECHNIQUE; NORMAL TISSUE; IMRT; PNEUMONITIS; ARC; ONCOLOGY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1177/1533034616670273
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective:Radiation treatment planning for locally advanced lung cancer can be technically challenging, as delivery of 60 Gy to large volumes with concurrent chemotherapy is often associated with significant risk of normal tissue toxicity. We clinically implemented a novel hybrid RapidArc technique in patients with lung cancer and compared these plans with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and RapidArc-only plans.Methods:Hybrid RapidArc was used to treat 11 patients with locally advanced lung cancer having bulky mediastinal adenopathy. All 11 patients received concurrent chemotherapy. All underwent a 4-dimensional computed tomography planning scan. Hybrid RapidArc plans concurrently combined static (60%) and RapidArc (40%) beams. All cases were replanned using 3- to 5-field 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and RapidArc technique as controls.Results:Significant reductions in dose were observed in hybrid RapidArc plans compared to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plans for total lung V20 and mean (-2% and -0.6 Gy); contralateral lung mean (-2.92 Gy); and esophagus V60 and mean (-16.0% and -2.2 Gy; all P < .05). Contralateral lung doses were significantly lower for hybrid RapidArc plans compared to RapidArc-only plans (all P < .05). Compared to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, heart V60 and mean dose were significantly improved with hybrid RapidArc (3% vs 5%, P = .04 and 16.32 Gy vs 16.65 Gy, P = .03). However, heart V40 and V45 and maximum spinal cord dose were significantly lower with RapidArc plans compared to hybrid RapidArc plans. Conformity and homogeneity were significantly better with hybrid RapidArc plans compared to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plans (P < .05). Treatment was well tolerated, with no grade 3+ toxicities.Conclusion:To our knowledge, this is the first report on the clinical application of hybrid RapidArc in patients with locally advanced lung cancer. Hybrid RapidArc permitted safe delivery of 60 to 66 Gy to large lung tumors with concurrent chemotherapy and demonstrated advantages for reduction in low-dose lung volumes, esophageal dose, and mean heart dose.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 230
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   On the possible benefits of a hybrid VMAT technique in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Agapito, John .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (04) :460-466
[2]   Fatal pneumonitis associated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for mesothelioma [J].
Allen, AM ;
Czerminska, M ;
Jänne, PA ;
Sugarbaker, DJ ;
Bueno, R ;
Harris, JR ;
Court, L ;
Baldini, EH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (03) :640-645
[3]   Timeline - Radiation oncology: a century of achievements [J].
Bernier, J ;
Hall, EJ ;
Giaccia, A .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2004, 4 (09) :737-U15
[4]   Improving radiotherapy planning for large volume lung cancer: A dosimetric comparison between hybrid-IMRT and RapidArc [J].
Blom, Gerrit J. ;
Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R. ;
Dahele, Max ;
Hoffmans, Daan ;
Slotman, Ben J. ;
Senan, Suresh .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2015, 54 (03)
[5]   The superiority of hybrid-volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique over double arcs VMAT and 3D-conformal technique in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer - A planning study [J].
Chan, Oscar S. H. ;
Lee, Michael C. H. ;
Hung, Albert W. M. ;
Chang, Amy T. Y. ;
Yeung, Rebecca M. W. ;
Lee, Anne W. M. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 101 (02) :298-302
[6]   Comparison of 3-D Conformal and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Outcomes for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in NRG Oncology/RTOG 0617 [J].
Chun, S. G. ;
Hu, C. ;
Choy, H. ;
Komaki, R. U. ;
Timmerman, R. D. ;
Schild, S. E. ;
Bogart, J. A. ;
Dobelbower, M. C. ;
Bosch, W. R. ;
Galvin, J. M. ;
Kavadi, V. S. ;
Narayan, S. ;
Iyengar, P. ;
Robinson, C. G. ;
Wynn, R. ;
Raben, A. ;
Augspurger, M. ;
MacRae, R. M. ;
Paulus, R. ;
Bradley, J. D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03) :S1-S2
[7]   Motion Management for Radical Radiotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer [J].
Cole, A. J. ;
Hanna, G. G. ;
Jain, S. ;
O'Sullivan, J. M. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 26 (02) :67-80
[8]   Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of dose fractionation on respiratory motion induced IMRT delivery errors: A volumetric dose measurement study [J].
Duan, J ;
Shen, S ;
Fiveash, JB ;
Popple, RA ;
Brezovich, IA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (05) :1380-1387
[9]   TOLERANCE OF NORMAL TISSUE TO THERAPEUTIC IRRADIATION [J].
EMAMI, B ;
LYMAN, J ;
BROWN, A ;
COIA, L ;
GOITEIN, M ;
MUNZENRIDER, JE ;
SHANK, B ;
SOLIN, LJ ;
WESSON, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :109-122
[10]   Is IMRT Superior or Inferior to 3DCRT in Radiotherapy for NSCLC? A Meta-Analysis [J].
Hu, Xingsheng ;
He, Wenwu ;
Wen, Shimin ;
Feng, Xuqin ;
Fu, Xi ;
Liu, Yusong ;
Pu, Ke .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (04)