Bypassing the learning curve in permanent seed implants using state-of-the-art technology

被引:30
作者
Beaulieu, Luc
Evans, Dee-Ann Radford
Aubin, Sylviane
Angyalfi, Steven
Husain, Siraj
Kay, Ian
Martin, Andre-Guy
Varfalvy, Nicolas
Vigneault, Eric
Dunscombe, Peter
机构
[1] CHUQ HDQ, Dept Radiooncol, Quebec City, PQ G1R 2J6, Canada
[2] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Dept Med Phys, Calgary, AB, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 67卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate brachytherapy; dosimetry; inverse planning; seed activity; seed misplacement; seed migration; computer optimization; automated delivery; intraoperative;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to demonstrate, based on clinical postplan dose distributions, that technology can be used efficiently to eliminate the learning curve associated with permanent seed implant planning and delivery. Methods and Materials: Dose distributions evaluated 30 days after the implant of the initial 22 consecutive patients treated with permanent seed implants at two institutions were studied. Institution 1 (I1) consisted of a new team, whereas institution 2 (I2) had performed more than 740 preplanned implantations over a 9-year period before the study. Both teams had adopted similar integrated systems based on three-dimensional (3D) transrectal ultrasonography, intraoperative dosimetry, and an automated seed delivery and needle retraction system (FIRST, Nucletron). Procedure time and dose volume histogram parameters such as D90, V100, V150, V200, and others were collected in the operating room and at 30 days postplan. Results: The average target coverage from the intraoperative plan (V100) was 99.4% for I1 and 99.9% for I2. D90, V150, and V200 were 191.4 Gy (196.3 Gy), 75.3 % (73.0 %), and 37.5 % (34.1 %) for I1 (I2) respectively. None of these parameters shows a significant difference between institutions. The postplan D90 was 151.2 Gy for I1 and 167.3 Gy for I2, well above the 140 Gy from the Stock et al. analysis, taking into account differences at planning, results in a p value of 0.0676. The procedure time required on average 174.4 min for I1 and 89 min for I2. The time was found to decrease with the increasing number of patients. Conclusion: State-of-the-art technology enables a new brachytherapy team to obtain excellent postplan dose distributions, similar to those achieved by an experienced team with proven long-term clinical results. The cost for bypassing the usual dosimetry learning curve is time, with increasing team experience resulting in shorter treatment times. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 77
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   THE AMERICAN-UROLOGICAL-ASSOCIATION SYMPTOM INDEX FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA [J].
BARRY, MJ ;
FOWLER, FJ ;
OLEARY, MP ;
BRUSKEWITZ, RC ;
HOLTGREWE, HL ;
MEBUST, WK ;
COCKETT, ATK ;
BLAIVAS, JG ;
WEIN, AJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (05) :1549-1557
[2]   The robustness of dose distributions to displacement and migration of 125I permanent seed implants over a wide range of seed number, activity, and designs [J].
Beaulieu, L ;
Archambault, L ;
Aubin, S ;
Oral, E ;
Taschereau, R ;
Pouliot, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (04) :1298-1308
[3]   Dosimetric impact of the variation of the prostate volume and shape between pretreatment planning and treatment procedure [J].
Beaulieu, L ;
Aubin, S ;
Taschereau, R ;
Pouliot, J ;
Vigneault, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (01) :215-221
[4]   Real-time optimized intraoperative dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy: A pilot study [J].
Beyer, DC ;
Shapiro, RH ;
Puente, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (05) :1583-1589
[5]   Centralized multiinstitutional postimplant analysis for interstitial prostate brachytherapy [J].
Bice, WS ;
Prestidge, BR ;
Grimm, PD ;
Friedland, JL ;
Feygelman, V ;
Roach, M ;
Prete, JL ;
Dubois, DF ;
Blasko, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (04) :921-927
[6]  
Crook Juanita M, 2005, Brachytherapy, V4, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.brachy.2005.01.002
[7]   An algorithm for automatic needle localization in ultrasound-guided breast biopsies [J].
Draper, KJ ;
Blake, CC ;
Gowman, L ;
Downey, DB ;
Fenster, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (08) :1971-1979
[8]  
EVANS DR, 2006, BRACHYTHERAPY, V5, P113
[9]   Ultrasonography and fluoroscopic fusion for prostate brachytherapy dosimetry [J].
Gong, LX ;
Cho, PS ;
Han, BH ;
Wallner, KE ;
Sutlief, SG ;
Pathak, SD ;
Haynor, DR ;
Kim, YM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (05) :1322-1330
[10]  
Lebrun B, 2004, RADIOTHER ONCOL, V71, pS35