Equally moved and not really sick from viewing 2D and 3D motion stimuli on a TV screen

被引:2
作者
Lubeck, Astrid J. A. [1 ]
Bos, Jelte E. [1 ,2 ]
Stins, John F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Res Inst MOVE, Dept Human Movement Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] TNO Perceptual & Cognit Syst, Soesterberg, Netherlands
关键词
Visually induced motion sickness; Stereoscopic; 3D; Postural control; Field of view; Quarantining; INFLUENCES POSTURAL ACTIVITY; SYMPTOMS; VARIABILITY; DISCOMFORT; EXPERIENCE; IMMERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.displa.2015.10.004
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective: Visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) and increased postural sway are two adverse side effects that may occur when viewing motion stimuli. However, whether these effects are elevated to a greater extent when viewing stereoscopic 3D motion stimuli, compared to 2D stimuli on a TV screen, has not been investigated under controlled circumstances. Therefore this study aimed at investigating VIMS and postural sway before, during, and directly after viewing 2D and 3D motion stimuli, on a commonly available TV screen. Method: 16 Participants were exposed to an aviation documentary shown in 2D and in 3D on separate occasions. Before, during, and after exposure, VIMS and postural sway were measured. VIMS was quantified by a rating scale giving a single number, and by a multi-symptom questionnaire that assessed multiple VIMS symptoms separately. Sway path length, standard deviations and short-range and long-range scaling components of the center of pressure were calculated as measures of postural sway. Results: VIMS symptom severity, as obtained with the single rating scale, did not show a significant increase to either 2D or 3D exposure. The multi -symptom questionnaire did reveal significant increases in VIMS symptom severity to both 2D and 3D exposure. However, VIMS was not significantly more increased in case of 3D exposure compared to 2D exposure. All postural sway measures (sway path length, standard deviation in mediolateral and anteroposterior direction, as well as the short-range scaling components) increased significantly as a result of exposure. None of the postural sway measures was differentially affected to 3D as compared to 2D exposure. Conclusion: Viewing 3D motion stimuli did not cause more serious VIMS symptoms, compared to viewing motion stimuli in 2D. We attribute this lack of difference to the fact that the 3D effects in this documentary were optimized for viewing in a cinema, the projection on the TV-screen thus causing quarantining of the visual input. The increase in postural sway, irrespective of image type, may reflect exploratory behavior, allowing the participant to gain more information about self-orientation with respect to the virtual environment. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Comparison of the Dosimetric Influence of Applicator Displacement on 2D and 3D Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer Treatment [J].
Wu, Ailin ;
Tang, Du ;
Wu, Aidong ;
Liu, Yunqin ;
Qian, Liting ;
Zhu, Lei .
TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2021, 20
[42]   Impact of brachytherapy technique (2D versus 3D) on outcome following radiotherapy of cervical cancer [J].
Derks, Kris ;
Steenhuijsen, Jacco L. G. ;
van den Berg, Hetty A. ;
Houterman, Saskia ;
Cnossen, Jeltsje ;
van Haaren, Paul ;
De Jaeger, Katrien .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2018, 10 (01) :17-25
[43]   Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of 2D and 3D Foveated Video Compression in Virtual Reality [J].
Jin, Yize ;
Chen, Meixu ;
Goodall, Todd ;
Patney, Anjul ;
Bovik, Alan C. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2021, 30 (30) :5905-5919
[44]   Responses of functional brain networks while watching 2D and 3D videos: An EEG study [J].
Yu, Minchang ;
Li, Yingjie ;
Tian, Feng .
BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2021, 68
[45]   Immersive Virtual Reality in Child Interview Skills Training: A Comparison of 2D and 3D Environments [J].
Salehi, Pegah ;
Hassan, Syed Zohaid ;
Baugerud, Gunn Astrid ;
Powell, Martine ;
Cano, M. Cayetana Lopez ;
Johnson, Miriam S. ;
Roed, Ragnhild Klingenberg ;
Johansen, Dag ;
Sabet, Saeed Shafiee ;
Riegler, Michael A. ;
Halvorsen, Pal .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 16TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON IMMERSIVE MIXED AND VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS, MMVE 2024, 2024, :1-7
[46]   Prediction of Pharyngeal 3D Volume Using 2D Lateral Area Measurements During Swallowing [J].
Bayona, Howell Henrian G. ;
Inamoto, Yoko ;
Saitoh, Eichii ;
Aihara, Keiko ;
Kobayashi, Masanao ;
Otaka, Yohei .
DYSPHAGIA, 2024, 39 (05) :783-796
[47]   Pancreas adenocarcinoma CT texture analysis: comparison of 3D and 2D tumor segmentation techniques [J].
Kulkarni, Ameya ;
Carrion-Martinez, Ivan ;
Dhindsa, Kiret ;
Alaref, Amer A. ;
Rozenberg, Radu ;
van der Pol, Christian B. .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (03) :1027-1033
[48]   2D and 3D MHD simulations of disk accretion by rotating magnetized stars: Search for variability [J].
Romanova, Marina M. ;
Kulkarni, Akshay ;
Long, Min ;
Lovelace, Richard V. E. ;
Wick, Justin V. ;
Ustyugova, Galina V. ;
Koldoba, Alexander V. .
SPECTRA AND TIMING OF COMPACT X-RAY BINARIES, 2006, 38 (12) :2887-+
[49]   3D dynamic contact analysis of tyre internal deformation using 2D image sensor [J].
Lim, JongWook ;
Kim, JongHwan ;
Kim, Sung Jin ;
Song, KyeJoo ;
Kim, Seong Yun .
JOURNAL OF STRAIN ANALYSIS FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2024, 59 (06) :401-407
[50]   Comparison of 3D Landmark and 3D Dense Cloud Approaches to Hominin Mandible Morphometrics Using Structure-From-Motion [J].
Hassett, B. R. ;
Lewis-Bale, T. .
ARCHAEOMETRY, 2017, 59 (01) :191-203