Cephalometric Evaluation of the Upper Airway in Different Skeletal Classifications of Jaws

被引:15
作者
Gholinia, Faeghe [1 ]
Habibi, Laleh
Boyouki, Maryam Amrollahi [2 ]
机构
[1] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Dent Sci Res Ctr, Rasht, Iran
[2] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Dept Orthodont, Student Res Comm, Fac Dent, Lakan Blvd, Rasht, Iran
关键词
Cephalometry; jaw's classification; upper airway; PHARYNGEAL AIRWAY; 3-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS; CRANIOFACIAL PATTERNS; MAXILLARY PROTRACTION; HEAD POSTURE; CLASS-I; DIMENSIONS; MORPHOLOGY; VOLUME; SPACE;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000005637
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Respiratory system is an important section in development of maxillofacial components and many studies indicated its effect on normal growth of the jaws. The aim of this study is to evaluate upper airway in different skeletal classifications of jaws in lateral cephalogram and its relation to age and gender. Materials and Methods: Study samples were 105 digital cephalometric radiographies, 72 females and 33 males. Lateral cephalograms were hand traced and based on Stainer analysis, there were 30 samples in Class I, 30 samples in Class II and 45 samples in Class III subgroup. Vertical linear measurements, horizontal linear measurements, and angular measurement, proportions and space measurements of the airway in the Cephalograms were analyzed by AutoCAD software. Results: Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 20. Two horizontal linear measurement (the hypo pharyngeal airway depth, the nasopharyngeal airway depth) and one space measurement (soft palate space) were significantly different in skeletal classes. Vertical and horizontal linear measurements in the 3 groups were increased significantly in men rather than women. The developmental age of groups showed some significant differences. Conclusion: Upper airway dimension is different in different skeletal classes, developmental ages, and gender.
引用
收藏
页码:E469 / E474
页数:7
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Allhaija ESA, 2005, ANGLE ORTHOD, V75, P1012
[2]   Evaluation of pharyngeal airway space amongst different skeletal patterns [J].
Alves, M., Jr. ;
Franzotti, E. S. ;
Baratieri, C. ;
Nunes, L. K. F. ;
Nojima, L. I. ;
Ruellas, A. C. O. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (07) :814-819
[3]  
Ansar J., 2015, J ORTHOD RES, V3, P108, DOI DOI 10.4103/2321-3825.149051
[4]  
Baccetti T, 2005, SEM ORTHOD
[5]  
Basheer Bahija, 2014, J Int Oral Health, V6, P50
[6]  
Batool I, 2010, PAKISTAN ORAL DENT J, V30
[7]   Dentofacial and upper airway characteristics of mild and severe class II division 1 subjects [J].
Bollhalder, Julia ;
Haenggi, Michael P. ;
Schaetzle, Marc ;
Markic, Goran ;
Roos, Malgorzata ;
Peltomaki, Timo A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2013, 35 (04) :447-453
[8]   Comparison of pharyngeal airway volume among different vertical skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study [J].
Celikoglu, Mevlut ;
Bayram, Mehmet ;
Sekerci, Ahmet E. ;
Buyuk, Suleyman K. ;
Toy, Ebubekir .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2014, 84 (05) :782-787
[9]   A STUDY ON THE PHARYNGEAL SIZE IN DIFFERENT SKELETAL PATTERNS [J].
CEYLAN, I ;
OKTAY, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1995, 108 (01) :69-75
[10]  
Chaturvedi S, 2014, J INDIAN ORTHOD SOC, V48, P256