The development, testing, and preliminary feasibility of an adaptable pediatric oncology nutrition algorithm for low-middle income countries

被引:10
|
作者
Fleming, C. A. K. [1 ]
Viani, K. [2 ]
Murphy, A. J. [3 ]
Mosby, T. T. [4 ]
Arora, B. [5 ]
Schoeman, J. [6 ,7 ]
Ladas, E. J. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ NSW Australia, UNSW Med, Sch Med Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Hosp Clin, Inst Crianca,Inst Tratamento Canc Infantil, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Queensland, Queensland Childrens Med Res Inst, Childrens Nutr Res Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Clin Nutr Serv, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[5] Tata Mem Hosp, Div Pediat Oncol, Bombay, Maharashtra, India
[6] Steve Biko Acad Hosp, Pretoria, South Africa
[7] Univ Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
[8] Columbia Univ, Div Pediat Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Transplant, New York, NY USA
关键词
Algorithm; low-middle income countries; nutrition; pediatric oncology; CANCER; CHILDREN; MALNUTRITION; PREVALENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.4103/0019-509X.175834
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Despite advances in the field of pediatric oncology, which have contributed to an overall increase in event-free survival, high rates of malnutrition in low-middle income countries (LMICs) is still a major concern. This paper aims to describe the multifaceted development process of a nutrition intervention algorithm for pediatric oncology in LMIC. METHODS: The development of evidence-based algorithm took place over seven developmental phases, utilizing an interdisciplinary process with the clinical review. Phase 1: Collaboration with the International Paediatric Oncology Nutrition Group. Phase 2: Review of peer-reviewed literature for evidence-based algorithm. Phase 3: Draft algorithm development. Phase 4: Draft algorithm presented at international meetings for stakeholder feedback. Phase 5: Consultation with LMIC dieticians to identify additional needs and feasibility of the algorithm in resource-poor settings. Phase 6: Review of the final draft algorithm by an expert panel. Phase 7: Pilot and Preliminary Feasibility. RESULTS: The nutrition algorithm was piloted in three LMIC countries (Brazil, South Africa and India). Overall the LMIC nutrition intervention algorithm was considered feasible for use with a "yes" response to the question "was the algorithm useful to know what nutrition to give the child and when" 90% of the time, rendering to the tool feasible. However, the testing process did identify several limitations that need to be considered in future versions. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive collaborative process with interdisciplinary health professionals has successfully developed a pediatric oncology nutrition intervention algorithm for LMIC. Further feasibility testing and a longitudinal study are required.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / U219
页数:4
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据