Higher dietary variety is associated with better nutritional status in frail elderly people

被引:182
作者
Bernstein, MA [1 ]
Tucker, KL
Ryan, ND
O'Neill, EF
Clements, KM
Nelson, ME
Evans, WJ
Singh, MAF
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Gerald J & Dorothy R Friedman Sch Nutr Sci & Poli, Ctr Phys Aciv & Nutr, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Hebrew Rehabil Ctr Aged, Fit Your Life Program, Boston, MA 02131 USA
[3] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Nutr Metab & Exercise Program, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[4] Univ Sydney, John Sutton Chair Exercise & Sports Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90246-4
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Objective A narrow range of food choices may lead to dietary inadequacies, a particular concern in elderly people. We hypothesized that consumption of a more diverse diet would predict better nutritional status in frail elderly persons. Subjects Subjects included 98 frail nursing home residents (36 men, 62 women), mean age 87.1+/-5.5 (72 to 98) years. Methods 3-day dietary variety scores ranging from 23 to 48 and fruit and vegetable variety scores ranging from 5 to 20 were calculated from weighed 3-day food records as the number of different food or fruit and vegetable choices consumed. A higher score indicates a more varied diet. Nutritional status was assessed by weight, height, body mass index (BMI), skinfold thickness, circumference measures, calculated mean arm muscle area, total body water, computerized tomography of the thigh, and total body potassium, as well as nutritional analysis, biochemical measures, and subject medical history. Statistical methods Univariate regression analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between clinical and nutrition variables. Multiple linear regressions were used to develop models relating dietary variety scores to possible etiologic factors as well as indicators of nutritional status. Models were controlled for age, BMI, and energy intake when appropriate. Results Mean dietary variety score was 35.2+/-4.5, and mean fruit and vegetable variety score was 11.3+/-3.0. Higher dietary variety score was associated with higher energy intake (beta=20.5, P<.001) and both high dietary variety score and fruit and vegetable variety score were positively associated with intake for marry nutrients (P <=.05). High dietary variety se ore vas related to high fruit and vegetable variety score and total intake of fruits and vegetables. In men, higher dietary variety score and fruit and vegetable variety score were associated with higher high-density lipoprotein (beta=1.02), lower very-low-density lipoprotein (beta= -3.58) and triglycerol (beta= -3.51), and higher blood folate (beta=4.72) concentrations in women (P <=.05). In women, high dietary variety score was associated with higher BMI (beta=0.34, P<.001) and higher total hotly potassium (beta= 1.30, P=.02); high fruit and vegetable variety score was associated with higher BMI (beta=0.41), mid-arm circumference (beta=0.34), and mid-arm muscle area (beta=2.94) (Pless than or equal to.03). Dietary variety score was higher (mean 37.6+/-5.38 vs 34.6+/-4.14) in those who received assistance with feeding (beta=2.67, P=.01). History of cancer (beta= -2.14) and gastrointenstinal cancer (beta= -3.54) were associated with low dietary variety score (Pless than or equal to.05). Conclusions The results of this study suggest that a highly varied diet in elderly nursing home residents is associated with better nutritional status as assessed by nutrient intake, biochemical measures, and body composition treasures. Dietary variety Score, is a straightforward tool fur screening and identifying people at nutritional risk, as well as a mechanism for monitoring response to nutritional, medical, and environmental interventions. preventive measures to improve dietary variety, as measured by the dietary variety score, should be evaluated and introduced before nutrition and health complications arise.
引用
收藏
页码:1096 / 1104
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[31]   FOOD VARIETY AS A QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTOR OF FOOD-INTAKE [J].
HODGSON, JM ;
HSUHAGE, BHH ;
WAHLQVIST, ML .
ECOLOGY OF FOOD AND NUTRITION, 1994, 32 (3-4) :137-148
[32]  
HODGSON JM, 1991, PROC NUTR SOC AUST, V16, P62
[33]  
HsuHage BHH, 1996, WORLD REV NUTR DIET, V79, P53
[34]   The 2000 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: What are the changes and why were they made? [J].
Johnson, RK ;
Kennedy, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2000, 100 (07) :769-774
[35]  
KANT AK, 1995, J AM COLL NUTR, V14, P358
[36]  
KANT AK, 1991, J AM DIET ASSOC, V91, P1526
[37]   DIETARY DIVERSITY AND SUBSEQUENT MORTALITY IN THE 1ST NATIONAL-HEALTH AND NUTRITION EXAMINATION SURVEY EPIDEMIOLOGIC FOLLOW-UP-STUDY [J].
KANT, AK ;
SCHATZKIN, A ;
HARRIS, TB ;
ZIEGLER, RG ;
BLOCK, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1993, 57 (03) :434-440
[38]   Indexes of overall diet quality: A review [J].
Kant, AK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 1996, 96 (08) :785-791
[39]   THE HEALTHY EATING INDEX - DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS [J].
KENNEDY, ET ;
OHLS, J ;
CARLSON, S ;
FLEMING, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 1995, 95 (10) :1103-1108
[40]  
KERSTETTER JE, 1995, J AM DIET ASSOC, V92, P1109