The Development of a New Generic Risk-of-Bias Measure for Systematic Reviews of Surveys

被引:24
作者
Nudelman, Gabriel [1 ]
Otto, Kathleen [2 ]
机构
[1] Acad Coll Tel Aviv Yaffo, Sch Behav Sci, POB 8401, IL-6818211 Jaffa, Israel
[2] Philipps Univ Marburg, Fac Psychol, Marburg, Germany
关键词
risk of bias; systematic review; meta-analysis; survey quality; correlational studies; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; VALIDITY; CHECKLIST; TOOL; EQUIVALENCE; RELIABILITY; PREVALENCE; AGREEMENT; KAPPA;
D O I
10.5964/meth.4329
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
It is important to evaluate risk of bias of the primary studies included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Since tools pertinent to surveys are scarce, the goal of the current research was to develop a measure to address this need. In Study 1, an initial list of 10 relevant topics was compiled from previous measures. In Study 2, the list was refined into an eight-item risk-of-bias measure via discussion and a pilot study. In Study 3, experienced researchers used the measure to asses 70 studies, demonstrating high interrater agreement (weighted Kappa = .82). Inexperienced raters also utilized the measure to code 26 different studies included in a prior meta-analysis, which resulted in adequate interrater agreement (weighted Kappa = .64) and excellent convergent validity (r = .66). Thus, the new measure, designed to be accessible and flexible, can increase standardization of riskof-bias evaluations and contribute to the interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analytic findings.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 298
页数:21
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Berg N., 2005, Encyclopedia of social measurement, V2, P865
[2]   EXTERNAL VALIDITY IS MORE THAN SKIN DEEP - SOME ANSWERS TO CRITICISMS OF LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS [J].
BERKOWITZ, L ;
DONNERSTEIN, E .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1982, 37 (03) :245-257
[3]  
Bhattacherjee A., 2012, Textbooks Collection. Book 3
[4]  
Borenstein M., 2021, INTRO METAANALYSIS
[5]   Sampling in developmental science: Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards [J].
Bornstein, Marc H. ;
Jager, Justin ;
Putnick, Diane L. .
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 2013, 33 (04) :357-370
[7]   The PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version: Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure in a Nonclinical Sample [J].
Conybeare, Daniel ;
Behar, Evelyn ;
Solomon, Ari ;
Newman, Michelle G. ;
Borkovec, T. D. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 68 (06) :699-713
[8]   Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study [J].
da Costa, Bruno R. ;
Beckett, Brooke ;
Diaz, Alison ;
Resta, Nina M. ;
Johnston, Bradley C. ;
Egger, Matthias ;
Juni, Peter ;
Armijo-Olivo, Susan .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
[9]   Testing for measurement equivalence of human values across online and paper-and-pencil surveys [J].
Davidov, Eldad ;
Depner, Felix .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2011, 45 (02) :375-390
[10]   The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions [J].
Downs, SH ;
Black, N .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (06) :377-384