Viewpoint Discovery and Understanding in Social Networks

被引:11
作者
Quraishi, Mainul [1 ]
Fafalios, Pavlos [1 ]
Herder, Eelco [2 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, L3S Res Ctr, Hannover, Germany
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
WEBSCI'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH ACM CONFERENCE ON WEB SCIENCE | 2018年
关键词
Viewpoint discovery; Viewpoint understanding; Social networks;
D O I
10.1145/3201064.3201076
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Web has evolved to a dominant platform where everyone has the opportunity to express their opinions, to interact with other users, and to debate on emerging events happening around the world. On the one hand, this has enabled the presence of different viewpoints and opinions about a usually controversial topic (like Brexit), but at the same time, it has led to phenomena like media bias, echo chambers and filter bubbles, where users are exposed to only one point of view on the same topic. Therefore, there is the need for methods that are able to detect and explain the different viewpoints. In this paper, we propose a graph partitioning method that exploits social interactions to enable the discovery of different communities (representing different viewpoints) discussing about a controversial topic in a social network like Twitter. To explain the discovered viewpoints, we describe a method, called Iterative Rank Difference (IRD), which allows detecting descriptive terms that characterize the different viewpoints as well as understanding how a specific term is related to a viewpoint (by detecting other related descriptive terms). The results of an experimental evaluation showed that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods on viewpoint discovery, while a qualitative analysis of the proposed IRD method on three different controversial topics showed that IRD provides comprehensive and deep representations of the different viewpoints.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 56
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Friendship Prediction and Homophily in Social Media [J].
Aiello, Luca Maria ;
Barrat, Alain ;
Schifanella, Rossano ;
Cattuto, Ciro ;
Markines, Benjamin ;
Menczer, Filippo .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON THE WEB, 2012, 6 (02)
[2]  
Al Khatib Khalid, 2012, P COLING 2012, P33
[3]   Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Gentzkow, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 31 (02) :211-235
[4]  
Almeida Julia C., 2011, Zootaxa, V2736, P44
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Polya Urn Models
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, COMP JOURN S
[7]   Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data [J].
Barbera, Pablo .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 23 (01) :76-91
[8]   Latent Dirichlet allocation [J].
Blei, DM ;
Ng, AY ;
Jordan, MI .
JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2003, 3 (4-5) :993-1022
[9]   Fast unfolding of communities in large networks [J].
Blondel, Vincent D. ;
Guillaume, Jean-Loup ;
Lambiotte, Renaud ;
Lefebvre, Etienne .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, 2008,
[10]   Societal Controversies in Wikipedia Articles [J].
Borra, Erik ;
Kaltenbrunner, Andreas ;
Mauri, Michele ;
Weltevrede, Esther ;
Laniado, David ;
Rogers, Richard ;
Ciuccarelli, Paolo ;
Magni, Giovanni ;
Venturini, Tommaso .
CHI 2015: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2015, :193-196