External heating and current drive source requirements towards steady-state operation in ITER

被引:23
|
作者
Poli, F. M. [1 ]
Kessel, C. E. [1 ]
Bonoli, P. T. [2 ]
Batchelor, D. B. [3 ]
Harvey, R. W. [4 ]
Snyder, P. B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Plasma Phys Lab, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
[2] MIT, Plasma Sci & Fus Ctr, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[4] CompX, Del Mar, CA 92014 USA
[5] Gen Atom Co, San Diego, CA 92186 USA
关键词
steady-state; heating; internal barriers; tokamak; reactor; current drive; INTERNAL TRANSPORT BARRIERS; L-MODE;
D O I
10.1088/0029-5515/54/7/073007
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Steady state scenarios envisaged for ITER aim at optimizing the bootstrap current, while maintaining sufficient confinement and stability to provide the necessary fusion yield. Non-inductive scenarios will need to operate with internal transport barriers (ITBs) in order to reach adequate fusion gain at typical currents of 9 MA. However, the large pressure gradients associated with ITBs in regions of weak or negative magnetic shear can be conducive to ideal MHD instabilities, reducing the no-wall limit. The E x B flow shear from toroidal plasma rotation is expected to be low in ITER, with a major role in the ITB dynamics being played by magnetic geometry. Combinations of heating and current drive (H/CD) sources that sustain reversed magnetic shear profiles throughout the discharge are the focus of this work. Time-dependent transport simulations indicate that a combination of electron cyclotron (EC) and lower hybrid (LH) waves is a promising route towards steady state operation in ITER. The LH forms and sustains expanded barriers and the EC deposition at mid-radius freezes the bootstrap current profile stabilizing the barrier and leading to confinement levels 50% higher than typical H-mode energy confinement times. Using LH spectra with spectrum centred on parallel refractive index of 1.75-1.85, the performance of these plasma scenarios is close to the ITER target of 9 MA non-inductive current, global confinement gain H-98 = 1.6 and fusion gain Q = 5.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Control of a steady-state operation using ICRF heating in the large helical device
    Kasahara, H.
    Seki, T.
    Saito, K.
    Kumazawa, R.
    Kubo, S.
    Shimozuma, T.
    Yoshimura, Y.
    Igami, H.
    Notake, T.
    Nakamura, Y.
    Miyazawa, J.
    Tanaka, K.
    Tokuzawa, T.
    Shimpo, F.
    Nomura, G.
    Yokota, M.
    Takahashi, C.
    Komori, A.
    Motojima, O.
    Mutoh, T.
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2008, 83 (2-3) : 253 - 255
  • [42] ISOTOPIC STEADY-STATE REQUIREMENTS - REPLY
    REINER, JM
    EXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, 1975, 22 (03) : 432 - 433
  • [43] Achievements and challenges for ITER heating & current drive systems
    Darbos, C.
    Beaumont, B.
    Boilson, D.
    Henderson, M. A.
    Rotti, C.
    2020 45TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFRARED, MILLIMETER, AND TERAHERTZ WAVES (IRMMW-THZ), 2020,
  • [44] Control systems for ITER diagnostics, heating and current drive
    Simrock, Stefan
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2016, 112 : 724 - 730
  • [45] Status of heating and current drive systems planned for ITER
    Singh, M. J.
    2015 IEEE 26TH SYMPOSIUM ON FUSION ENGINEERING (SOFE), 2015,
  • [46] Status of Heating and Current Drive Systems Planned for ITER
    Singh, M. J.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 2016, 44 (09) : 1514 - 1524
  • [47] PREDICTIONS OF ELECTRON CYCLOTRON CURRENT DRIVE AND HEATING IN ITER
    Budny, R. V.
    Kessel, C. E.
    Indireshkumar, K.
    ELECTRON CYCLOTRON EMISSION AND ELECTRON CYCLOTRON RESONANCE HEATING, 2009, : 369 - 375
  • [48] STEADY-STATE PERFORMANCE OF VOLTAGE SOURCE INVERTER SYNCHRONOUS MACHINE DRIVE SYSTEMS
    KAUFMAN, GA
    PLUNKETT, AB
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 1984, 20 (04) : 753 - 762
  • [49] Power requirements for electron cyclotron current drive and ion cyclotron resonance heating for sawtooth control in ITER
    Chapman, I. T.
    Graves, J. P.
    Sauter, O.
    Zucca, C.
    Asunta, O.
    Buttery, R. J.
    Coda, S.
    Goodman, T.
    Igochine, V.
    Johnson, T.
    Jucker, M.
    La Haye, R. J.
    Lennholm, M.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2013, 53 (06)
  • [50] OPTIMAL STEADY-STATE OPERATION IN DISTILLATION
    WALLER, KV
    GUSTAFSSON, TK
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY PROCESS DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, 1978, 17 (03): : 313 - 317