Effect of Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Donor Site Morbidity in Breast Reconstruction with Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap

被引:5
作者
Kang, Songsu [1 ]
Okumura, Seiko [1 ]
Maruyama, Yoko [1 ]
Hyodo, Ikuo [1 ,2 ]
Nakamura, Ryota [1 ]
Kobayashi, Saya [1 ]
Kato, Maho [1 ]
Takanari, Keisuke [1 ]
机构
[1] Aichi Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[2] Univ Occupat & Environm Hlth, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Fukuoka, Japan
来源
JPRAS OPEN | 2022年 / 34卷
关键词
Closed incision negative pressure wound; therapy; Breast reconstruction; Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator; flap; Postoperative wound complication; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; TRAM; DIEP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpra.2022.08.002
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The usefulness of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been well documented in many surgical sites, except for the donor site of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ciNPWT on microsurgical breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap. Methods: Fifty-six cases of breast reconstruction with DIEP flap were included and divided into two groups based on post-surgical wound management: the ciNPWT group received ciNPWT at the donor site, while the conventional group received conventional wound management. The primary outcomes were the incidence of seroma, wound dehiscence, and surgical site infection, and secondary outcomes were the time to drain removal and amount of drainage. The breast reconstruction risk assessment (BRA) score was used to evaluate the comprehensive risk in each case. Results: Among the patient and surgical characteristics, only the BRA score (P= 0.02) and the time to elevate the flap (P= 0.02) were significantly higher and longer in the ciNPWT group, respectively. The incidence of seroma, dehiscence, and wound infection showed no significant difference between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis of patients with body mass index >= 25, the primary outcomes did not differ, while the secondary outcomes were significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (drainage volume, P = 0.04; time to drain removal, P = 0.04) Conclusion: ciNPWT can potentially reduce the incidence of donor site complications of DIEP flaps, especially if the comprehensive risk for post-surgical complications is considered. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 81
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Ailaney Nikhil, 2020, J ARTHROPLASTY, P31230
  • [2] Meta-analysis of operative mortality and complications in patients from minority ethnic groups
    Bloo, G. J. A.
    Hesselink, G. J.
    Oron, A.
    Emond, E. J. J. M.
    Damen, J.
    Dekkers, W. J. M.
    Westert, G.
    Wolff, A. P.
    Calsbeek, H.
    Wollersheim, H. C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (11) : 1341 - 1349
  • [3] Going into surgery: Risk factors for hypertrophic scarring
    Butzelaar, Lisolette
    Soykan, Ezgi A.
    Garre, Francisca Galindo
    Beelen, Robert H. J.
    Ulrich, Magda M.
    Niessen, Frank B.
    van der Molen, Aebele B. Mink
    [J]. WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2015, 23 (04) : 531 - 537
  • [4] Comprehensive Analysis of Donor-Site Morbidity in Abdominally Based Free Flap Breast Reconstruction
    Chang, Edward I.
    Chang, Eric I.
    Soto-Miranda, Miguel A.
    Zhang, Hong
    Nosrati, Naveed
    Robb, Geoffrey L.
    Chang, David W.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (06) : 1383 - 1391
  • [5] Complications and Patient-reported Outcomes after TRAM and DIEP Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    He, Waverley Y.
    El Eter, Leen
    Yesantharao, Pooja
    Hung, Bethany
    Owens, Haley
    Persing, Sarah
    Sacks, Justin M.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (10) : E3120
  • [6] Meta-analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions
    Hyldig, N.
    Birke-Sorensen, H.
    Kruse, M.
    Vinter, C.
    Joergensen, J. S.
    Sorensen, J. A.
    Mogensen, O.
    Lamont, R. F.
    Bille, C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (05) : 477 - 486
  • [7] Individualized Risk of Surgical Complications: An Application of the Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment Score
    Kim, John Y. S.
    Mlodinow, Alexei S.
    Khavanin, Nima
    Hume, Keith M.
    Simmons, Christopher J.
    Weiss, Michael J.
    Murphy, Robert X., Jr.
    Gutowski, Karol A.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2015, 3 (05)
  • [8] Are high-risk patient and revision arthroplasty effective indications for closed-incisional negative-pressure wound therapy after total hip or knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Jun-Ho
    Lee, Dae-Hee
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2020, 17 (05) : 1310 - 1322
  • [9] A systematic review of donor site aesthetic and complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction
    Lindenblatt, Nicole
    Gruenherz, Lisanne
    Farhadi, Jian
    [J]. GLAND SURGERY, 2019, 8 (04) : 389 - +
  • [10] The effect of postoperative closed incision negative pressure therapy on the incidence of donor site wound dehiscence in breast reconstruction patients: DEhiscence PREvention Study (DEPRES), pilot randomized controlled trial
    Muller-Sloof, E.
    de Laat, H. E. W.
    Hummelink, S. L. M.
    Peters, J. W. B.
    Ulrich, D. J. O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2018, 27 (04) : 262 - 266