Indicators of environmental performance to assess wood-based bioenergy production: A case study in Northern Italy

被引:25
作者
Buonocore, Elvira [1 ]
Paletto, Alessandro [2 ]
Russo, Giovanni F. [1 ]
Franzese, Pier Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Parthenope Univ Naples, Dept Sci & Technol, Lab Ecodynam & Sustainable Dev, Naples, Italy
[2] Council Agr Res & Econ, Forest Monitoring & Planning Res Unit CREA MPF, Villazzano, Trento, Italy
关键词
Wood biomass; Bioenergy; Environmental accounting; Environmental performance; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MAPPING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIOMASS; SYSTEMS; SUSTAINABILITY; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.272
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increased environmental concerns, mainly related to fossil fuels consumption and global climate change, have drawn the attention to the dependence of human society on energy supply. As a consequence of EU Directives setting mandatory renewable energy targets up to 2020, member states are boosting renewable energy and bioenergy production. The use of wood biomass for bioenergy production can entail important benefits, including improved energy security due to a smaller dependence on fossil fuel supply, mitigation of climate impact, and revitalization of rural economies connected to new job opportunities. Nevertheless, bioenergy production also involves environmental and socio-economic concerns. The environmental, economic, and social sustainability of bioenergy production needs to be assessed through a set of multicriteria indicators. In this study, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was used to explore the environmental performance of bioenergy production in an Alpine area of Northern Italy. In particular, the environmental impacts of a wood-based bioenergy plant utilizing local residues from wood industries and forestry operations were investigated. The amount of CO2-eq emissions (0.25 kg CO2-eq kWh(-1)) and the fossil demand (0.09 kg oil-eq kWh(-1)) calculated for the investigated bioenergy plant resulted lower than the values characterizing fossil fuels-based power plants. Yet, the environmental performance of the investigated bioenergy plant was affected by the consumption of methane, still used in the plant to cover peak loads. The results showed that the use of local wood biomass in the investigated Alpine area is a desirable option for recycling wood residues while supporting heat and electricity production. The findings of this study can support local managers and policy makers committed to plan and implement renewable energy strategies and circular economy patterns. In addition, they can be useful to assess the potential upscale of this bioenergy option at regional and national level considering the availability of wood residues (from forestry and industrial sector) while verifying possible operational constraints at larger scales. Future studies could also integrate environmental accounting with other assessment methods exploring the economic profitability and social desirability of wood-based bioenergy production in mountain areas characterized by low population density and large forest cover. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 248
页数:7
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, Technical Report
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, J ENVIRON ACCOUNT MA, DOI 10.5890/JEAM.2014.03.001
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, INT REFERENCE LIFE C
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, J ENV ACC MANAG
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2017, TECHN ROADM DEL SUST
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2011, GLOB BIOEN PARTN SUS
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2016, EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2016: Technical guidance to prepare national emission inventories
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14044:2006, Environmental managment- Life cycle assessment- Principles and framework
  • [10] Life cycle assessment indicators of urban wastewater and sewage sludge treatment
    Buonocore, Elvira
    Mellino, Salvatore
    De Angelis, Giuseppe
    Liu, Gengyuan
    Ulgiati, Sergio
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 94 : 13 - 23