How to manage creativity in organizations: Connecting the literature on organizational creativity through bibliometric research

被引:22
作者
Fetrati, Mahdieh A. [1 ]
Hansen, David [2 ]
Akhavan, Payman [3 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Mat & Prod, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Technol & Innovat, Odense, Denmark
[3] Qom Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn, Qom, Iran
关键词
Organizational creativity; Bibliometric study; Creativity; Organization; EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY; INNOVATION; IDEAS; IMPLEMENTATION; MODEL; WORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102473
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
To be competitive, organizations must also be innovative, making organizational creativity a crucial capability. Accordingly, the past decade has seen an increasing attention among scholars to fields such as innovation, organizational performance, and creativity. Nevertheless, studies in organizational creativity, i.e., the management of creativity at an organizational level, are still fragmented and have not converged into a single comprehensive conceptual model. The purpose of this paper is to scrutinize the literature on organizational creativity in order to map the different perspectives on the subject and provide direction for future research. The paper thoroughly explores the literature through bibliographic research on papers published between 1980 and 2020. The literature is mapped, categorized, and analyzed to identify the different models of organizational creativity, i.e., concepts, definitions, and theories. The paper identifies seven models and shows that field could converge by connecting two tracks of the literature: the track of the dynamic componential model with the track of the personal and contextual factors. Furthermore, the paper uses this insight to propose practical guidelines for managing creativity by mapping contextual factors at the individual, team, and organizational levels that can be used with the dynamic componential model.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
ABERNATHY WJ, 1978, TECHNOL REV, V80, P40
[2]   Major trends in knowledge management research: a bibliometric study [J].
Akhavan, Peyman ;
Ebrahim, Nader Ale ;
Fetrati, Mahdieh A. ;
Pezeshkan, Amir .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 107 (03) :1249-1264
[3]   Social capital, knowledge sharing, and innovation capability: an empirical study of R&D teams in Iran [J].
Akhavan, Peyman ;
Hosseini, S. Mahdi .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2016, 28 (01) :96-113
[4]  
Amabile T.M., 1998, How to kill creativity, V87
[5]   The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning [J].
Amabile, Teresa M. ;
Pratt, Michael G. .
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, VOL 36, 2016, 36 :157-183
[7]  
AMABILE TM, 1988, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V10, P123
[8]   Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework [J].
Anderson, Neil ;
Potocnik, Kristina ;
Zhou, Jing .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (05) :1297-1333
[9]  
Andriopoulos C, 2001, DETERMINANTS ORG CRE
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2015, QUAL PROG