A brief look at model-based dose calculation principles, practicalities, and promise

被引:13
作者
Slobodo, Ron S. [1 ,2 ]
Morrison, Hali [1 ,2 ]
Cowston-Grant, Brie [1 ,2 ]
Menon, Geetha V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Oncol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Alberta Hlth Serv, Cross Canc Inst, Dept Med Phys, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
dose calculation; MBDCA; Monte Carlo; TG-43; EMITTING BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCES; RATE IR-192 BRACHYTHERAPY; MONTE-CARLO DOSIMETRY; AAPM; I-125; TG-43; CANCER; PD-103; SEED; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.5114/jcb.2017.65849
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) have recently emerged as potential successors to the highly practical, but sometimes inaccurate TG-43 formalism for brachytherapy treatment planning. So named for their capacity to more accurately calculate dose deposition in a patient using information from medical images, these approaches to solve the linear Boltzmann radiation transport equation include point kernel superposition, the discrete ordinates method, and Monte Carlo simulation. In this overview, we describe three MBDCAs that are commercially available at the present time, and identify guidance from professional societies and the broader peer-reviewed literature intended to facilitate their safe and appropriate use. We also highlight several important considerations to keep in mind when introducing an MBDCA into clinical practice, and look briefly at early applications reported in the literature and selected from our own ongoing work. The enhanced dose calculation accuracy offered by a MBDCA comes at the additional cost of modelling the geometry and material composition of the patient in treatment position (as determined from imaging), and the treatment applicator (as characterized by the vendor). The adequacy of these inputs and of the radiation source model, which needs to be assessed for each treatment site, treatment technique, and radiation source type, determines the accuracy of the resultant dose calculations. Although new challenges associated with their familiarization, commissioning, clinical implementation, and quality assurance exist, MBDCAs clearly afford an opportunity to improve brachytherapy practice, particularly for low-energy sources.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 88
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] ACE: Advanced Collapsed Cone Engine, 2014, CISC VIS NETW IND GL
  • [2] ALGEBRA: ALgorithm for the heterogeneous dosimetry based on GEANT4 for BRAchytherapy
    Afsharpour, H.
    Landry, G.
    D'Amours, M.
    Enger, S.
    Reniers, B.
    Poon, E.
    Carrier, J-F
    Verhaegen, F.
    Beaulieu, L.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (11) : 3273 - 3280
  • [3] Collapsed cone dose calculations for heterogeneous tissues in brachytherapy using primary and scatter separation source data
    Ahnesjo, Anders
    van Veelen, Bob
    Tedgren, Asa Carlsson
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2017, 139 : 17 - 29
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, WORLD C BRACH 2016 S
  • [5] Improved treatment planning for COMS eye plaques
    Astrahan, MA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (04): : 1227 - 1242
  • [6] A generic high-dose rate 192Ir brachytherapy source for evaluation of model-based dose calculations beyond the TG-43 formalism
    Ballester, Facundo
    Tedgren, Asa Carlsson
    Granero, Domingo
    Haworth, Annette
    Mourtada, Firas
    Fonseca, Gabriel Paiva
    Zourari, Kyveli
    Papagiannis, Panagiotis
    Rivard, Mark J.
    Siebert, Frank-Andre
    Sloboda, Ron S.
    Smith, Ryan L.
    Thomson, Rowan M.
    Verhaegen, Frank
    Vijande, Javier
    Ma, Yunzhi
    Beaulieu, Luc
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3048 - 3062
  • [7] Beaulieu L., 2016, BRACHYTHERAPY, V15, pS172, DOI [10.1016/j.brachy.2016.04.311, DOI 10.1016/J.BRACHY.2016.04.311]
  • [8] Report of the Task Group 186 on model-based dose calculation methods in brachytherapy beyond the TG-43 formalism: Current status and recommendations for clinical implementation
    Beaulieu, Luc
    Tedgren, Asa Carlsson
    Carrier, Jean-Francois
    Davis, Stephen D.
    Mourtada, Firas
    Rivard, Mark J.
    Thomson, Rowan M.
    Verhaegen, Frank
    Wareing, Todd A.
    Williamson, Jeffrey F.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (10) : 6208 - 6236
  • [9] Dosimetric effects of seed anisotropy and interseed attenuation for 103Pd and 125I prostate implants
    Chibani, O
    Williamson, JF
    Todor, D
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (08) : 2557 - 2566
  • [10] The use of new GAFCHROMIC® EBT film for 125I seed dosimetry in Solid Water® phantom
    Chiu-Tsao, Sou-Tung
    Medich, David
    Munro, John, III
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (08) : 3787 - 3799