Impact of topographic internal lee wave drag on an eddying global ocean model

被引:47
作者
Trossman, David S. [1 ,2 ]
Arbic, Brian K. [1 ]
Richman, James G. [3 ]
Garner, Stephen T. [4 ]
Jayne, Steven R. [5 ]
Wallcraft, Alan J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Montreal, PQ H3A 0B9, Canada
[3] SSC, NRL, Div Oceanog, Mississippi State, MS USA
[4] NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ USA
[5] Woods Hole Oceanog Inst, Dept Phys Oceanog, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Internal lee waves; Parameterization; Topographic blocking; Model evaluation; AVISO; Current meters; WESTERN-BOUNDARY-CURRENT; CURRENT-METER RECORDS; GEOSTROPHIC TURBULENCE; GENERAL-CIRCULATION; ABYSSAL CIRCULATION; ROUGH TOPOGRAPHY; SOUTHERN-OCEAN; DEEP-OCEAN; PART I; PARAMETERIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.10.013
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The impact of topographic internal lee wave drag (wave drag hereafter) on several aspects of the low frequency circulation in a high resolution global ocean model forced by winds and air-sea buoyancy fluxes is examined here. The HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) is run at two different horizontal resolutions (one nominally 1/12 degrees and the other 1/25 degrees). Wave drag, which parameterizes both topographic blocking and the generation of lee waves arising from geostrophic flow impinging upon rough topography, is inserted into the simulations as they run. The parameterization used here affects the momentum equations and hence the structure of eddy kinetic energy. Lee waves also have implications for diapycnal mixing in the ocean, though the parameterization does not directly modify the density. Total near bottom energy dissipation due to wave drag and quadratic bottom boundary layer drag is nearly doubled, and the energy dissipation due to quadratic bottom drag is reduced by about a factor of two, in simulations with an inserted wave drag compared to simulations having only quadratic bottom drag. With the insertion of wave drag, the kinetic energy is reduced in the abyss and in a three-dimensional global integral. Deflection by partial topographic blocking is inferred to be one reason why the near-bottom kinetic energy can increase in locations where there is little change in dissipation by quadratic bottom drag. Despite large changes seen in the abyss, the changes that occur near the sea surface are relatively small upon insertion of wave drag into the simulations. Both the sea surface height variance and geostrophic surface kinetic energy are reduced On global average by more than twice the seasonal variability in these diagnostics. Alterations in the intensified jet positions brought about by inserting wave drag are not distinguishable from the temporal variability of jet positions. Various statistical measures suggest that applying wave drag only within a fixed distance from the seafloor is not detrimental to the model performance relative to observations. However, the introduction of a novel diagnostic suggests that one way to improve the wave drag parameterization is to allow the vertical deposition of lee wave momentum flux to be spatially heterogeneous. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 128
页数:20
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] Effects of Non-orographic Gravity Wave Drag on Seasonal and Medium-range Predictions in a Global Forecast Model
    Hyun-Joo Choi
    Ji-Young Han
    Myung-Seo Koo
    Hye-Yeong Chun
    Young-Ha Kim
    Song-You Hong
    [J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 2018, 54 : 385 - 402
  • [22] The Impact of Finite-Amplitude Bottom Topography on Internal Wave Generation in the Southern Ocean
    Nikurashin, Maxim
    Ferrari, Raffaele
    Grisouard, Nicolas
    Polzin, Kurt
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY, 2014, 44 (11) : 2938 - 2950
  • [23] Evaluating the Global Internal Wave Model IDEMIX Using Finestructure Methods
    Pollmann, Friederike
    Eden, Carsten
    Olbers, Dirk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY, 2017, 47 (09) : 2267 - 2289
  • [24] Effects of sea ice form drag on the polar oceans in the NEMO-LIM3 global ocean-sea ice model
    Sterlin, Jean
    Tsamados, Michel
    Fichefet, Thierry
    Massonnet, Francois
    Barbic, Gaia
    [J]. OCEAN MODELLING, 2023, 184
  • [25] Impact of Grid Resolution on Wave-Mean Flow Interactions With High Resolution Mars Global Climate Model Simulations
    Kling, Alexandre
    Wilson, R. John
    Kahre, Melinda
    Brecht, Amanda
    Murphy, James
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 52 (02)
  • [26] Phase-Accurate Internal Tides in a Global Ocean Forecast Model: Potential Applications for Nadir and Wide-Swath Altimetry
    Yadidya, Badarvada
    Arbic, Brian K.
    Shriver, Jay F.
    Nelson, Arin D.
    Zaron, Edward D.
    Buijsman, Maarten C.
    Thakur, Ritabrata
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 51 (04)
  • [27] Impact of gravity wave drag on the thermospheric circulation: implementation of a nonlinear gravity wave parameterization in a whole-atmosphere model
    Miyoshi, Yasunobu
    Yigit, Erdal
    [J]. ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2019, 37 (05) : 955 - 969
  • [28] Inferring diapycnal mixing using the internal wave continuum from the high resolution ocean model
    Jiang, Shumin
    Dai, Dejun
    Wang, Dingqi
    Wang, Shihong
    Li, Ying
    Guo, Jingsong
    Qiao, Fangli
    [J]. OCEAN MODELLING, 2025, 195
  • [29] Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean-sea ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)
    Chassignet, Eric P.
    Yeager, Stephen G.
    Fox-Kemper, Baylor
    Bozec, Alexandra
    Castruccio, Frederic
    Danabasoglu, Gokhan
    Horvat, Christopher
    Kim, Who M.
    Koldunov, Nikolay
    Li, Yiwen
    Lin, Pengfei
    Liu, Hailong
    Sein, Dmitry, V
    Sidorenko, Dmitry
    Wang, Qiang
    Xu, Xiaobiao
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 13 (09) : 4595 - 4637
  • [30] The impact of a downslope water-transport parametrization in a global ocean general circulation model
    S. Legutke
    E. Maier-Reimer
    [J]. Climate Dynamics, 2002, 18 : 611 - 623