State funding pressure in interest groups, political parties and service-oriented membership organisations

被引:3
作者
Bolleyer, Nicole [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Geschwister Scholl Inst Polit Sci, Munich, Germany
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Membership organisations; groups; political parties; resource dependencies; state funding; PUBLIC-RESOURCE DEPENDENCE; CIVIL-SOCIETY; VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS; NONPROFIT SECTOR; IMPACT; DEMOCRACY; AGENCIES; AUTONOMY; DIVERSIFICATION; CHARITIES;
D O I
10.1080/01402382.2020.1838193
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article explores which interest groups, political parties and service-oriented organisations - membership-based voluntary organisations constitutive for civil society - experience the accessing and maintenance of state funding as a major challenge and why. Building on resource dependency theory, hypotheses are presented on how different financial dependencies (public and private) and the diversity of organisational income affect how intensely membership-based organisations are exposed to state funding pressure. Testing these hypotheses with new data from four organisation surveys in Germany, Norway, Switzerland and the UK indicates that different types of state funding dependencies (e.g. grants, contracts) as well as funding diversity increase organisational concerns about state funding, while reliance on membership fees reduces them. These findings have important repercussions as state funding pressure is central to organisations' revenue-seeking behaviour by focussing leaders' attention on state authorities, thereby redirecting organisational priorities away from organisations' constituencies.
引用
收藏
页码:1577 / 1603
页数:27
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [1] Political parties and interest groups: Disentangling complex relationships
    Allern, Elin H.
    Bale, Tim
    [J]. PARTY POLITICS, 2012, 18 (01) : 7 - 25
  • [2] Do government grants to private charities crowd out giving or fund-raising?
    Andreoni, J
    Payne, AA
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (03) : 792 - 812
  • [3] Defining and classifying interest groups
    Baroni, Laura
    Carroll, Brendan J.
    William Chalmers, Adam
    Munoz Marquez, Luz Maria
    Rasmussen, Anne
    [J]. INTEREST GROUPS & ADVOCACY, 2014, 3 (02): : 141 - 159
  • [4] Surviving Mission Drift How Charities Can Turn Dependence on Government Contract Funding to Their Own Advantage
    Bennett, Roger
    Savani, Sharmila
    [J]. NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP, 2011, 22 (02) : 217 - 231
  • [5] Making Inference across Mobilisation and Influence Research: Comparing Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mapping of Interest Systems
    Berkhout, Joost
    Beyers, Jan
    Braun, Caelesta
    Hanegraaff, Marcel
    Lowery, David
    [J]. POLITICAL STUDIES, 2018, 66 (01) : 43 - 62
  • [6] Beyers J, 2008, W EUROPEAN POLITICS, V31, P6
  • [7] Biela Jan., 2013, POLICY MAKING MULTIL
  • [8] Billis D., 2010, HYBRID ORG 3 SECTOR
  • [9] Membership Recruitment and Internal Democracy in Interest Groups: Do Group-Membership Relations Vary Between Group Types?
    Binderkrantz, Anne Skorkjaer
    [J]. WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2009, 32 (03) : 657 - 678
  • [10] Boatright R., 2015, The Deregulatory Moment? A Comparative Perspective on Changing Campaign Finance Laws