Quantifying the impact of network structure on speed and accuracy in collective decision-making

被引:6
作者
Daniels, Bryan C. [1 ]
Romanczuk, Pawel [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, ASU SFI Ctr Biosocial Complex Syst, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[2] Humboldt Univ, Dept Biol, Inst Theoret Biol, Berlin, Germany
[3] Bernstein Ctr Computat Neurosci, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Collective computation; Neural networks; Symmetry-breaking transition; Stochastic dynamical systems; Rich club; RICH-CLUB ORGANIZATION; CONSENSUS; DYNAMICS; CRITICALITY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1007/s12064-020-00335-1
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Found in varied contexts from neurons to ants to fish, binary decision-making is one of the simplest forms of collective computation. In this process, information collected by individuals about an uncertain environment is accumulated to guide behavior at the aggregate scale. We study binary decision-making dynamics in networks responding to inputs with small signal-to-noise ratios, looking for quantitative measures of collectivity that control performance in this task. We find that decision accuracy is directly correlated with the speed of collective dynamics, which is in turn controlled by three factors: the leading eigenvalue of the network adjacency matrix, the corresponding eigenvector's participation ratio, and distance from the corresponding symmetry-breaking bifurcation. A novel approximation of the maximal attainable timescale near such a bifurcation allows us to predict how decision-making performance scales in large networks based solely on their spectral properties. Specifically, we explore the effects of localization caused by the hierarchical assortative structure of a "rich club" topology. This gives insight into the trade-offs involved in the higher-order structure found in living networks performing collective computations.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 390
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Follow the straggler: zebrafish use a simple heuristic for collective decision-making
    Kadak, Kevin
    Miller, Noam
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 287 (1940)
  • [42] Effects of network topology and trait distribution on collective decision making
    Liu, Pengyu
    Jian, Jie
    AIMS MATHEMATICS, 2023, 8 (05): : 12287 - 12320
  • [43] Collective decision-making appears more egalitarian in populations where group fission costs are higher
    Herbert-Read, J. E.
    Wade, A. S. I.
    Ramnarine, I. W.
    Ioannou, C. C.
    BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 15 (12)
  • [44] Adaptive network models of collective decision making in swarming systems
    Chen, Li
    Huepe, Cristian
    Gross, Thilo
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2016, 94 (02)
  • [45] Diversity and Social Network Structure in Collective Decision Making: Evolutionary Perspectives with Agent-Based Simulations
    Dionne, Shelley D.
    Sayama, Hiroki
    Yammarino, Francis J.
    COMPLEXITY, 2019, 2019
  • [46] Information Centrality and Ordering of Nodes for Accuracy in Noisy Decision-Making Networks
    Poulakakis, Ioannis
    Young, George F.
    Scardovi, Luca
    Leonard, Naomi Ehrich
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2016, 61 (04) : 1040 - 1045
  • [47] Multiscale analysis of collective motion and decision-making in swarms: An advection-diffusion equation with memory approach
    Raghib, M.
    Levin, S. A.
    Kevrekidis, I. G.
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2010, 264 (03) : 893 - 913
  • [48] From Social Network (Centralized vs. Decentralized) to Collective Decision-Making (Unshared vs. Shared Consensus)
    Sueur, Cedric
    Deneubourg, Jean-Louis
    Petit, Odile
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (02):
  • [49] Collective action or individual choice: Spontaneity and individuality contribute to decision-making in Drosophila
    Steymans, Isabelle
    Pujol-Lereis, Luciana M.
    Brembs, Bjorn
    Axel Gorostiza, E.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):
  • [50] Decision-making theories: linking the disparate research areas of individual and collective cognition
    Pele, Marie
    Sueur, Cedric
    ANIMAL COGNITION, 2013, 16 (04) : 543 - 556