Care Quality, Technology Use, and Online Patient Perception

被引:0
作者
Saifee, Danish H. [1 ]
Bardhan, Indranil R. [2 ]
Lahiri, Atanu [3 ]
Zheng, Zhiqiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Univ Texas Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES | 2019年
关键词
Online reviews; clinical guidelines; adherence; physician quality reporting; electronic health records; text mining; online reputation; care quality; efficiency; WORD-OF-MOUTH; WEBSITE RATINGS; REVIEWS; PHYSICIANS; SALES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The literature on the efficacy of online reviews suggests that such reviews are usually effective in informing consumers about the product or service. This mitigates information asymmetry, paving the way for an efficient marketplace. However, the literature is unclear about the usefulness of online reviews in the healthcare context. Since healthcare is largely a credence good, it is indeed possible that online reviews are not as informative in its case as they are in some others. In this work, we take a closer look at what online physician reviews actually capture, by studying the association between online reputation of a physician and her adherence to clinical guidelines. We also study the association between reputation and electronic health record (EHR) usage. Our results reveal that online reputation does not adequately reflect care quality, in the sense that improved adherence to care guidelines does not seem to be associated with better online reviews. However, EHR usage seems to have a somewhat positive association, suggesting that reviews can capture efficiency improvements from information technology even when they do not capture care quality.
引用
收藏
页码:6697 / 6706
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The relationship between commercial website ratings and traditional hospital performance measures in the USA [J].
Bardach, Naomi S. ;
Asteria-Penaloza, Renee ;
Boscardin, W. John ;
Dudley, R. Adams .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 (03) :194-202
[2]   Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients' choices of physicians [J].
Burkle, Christopher M. ;
Keegan, Mark T. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
[3]   Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a news element of marketing communication mix [J].
Chen, Yubo ;
Xie, Jinhong .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 54 (03) :477-491
[4]   The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews [J].
Chevalier, Judith A. ;
Mayzlin, Dina .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2006, 43 (03) :345-354
[5]  
Clemons EK, 2006, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V23, P149, DOI [10.2753/MIS0742-1222230207, 10.2753/M1S0742-1222230207]
[6]   FREE COMPETITION AND OPTIMAL AMOUNT OF FRAUD [J].
DARBY, MR ;
KARNI, E .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1973, 16 (01) :67-88
[7]  
Dellarocas C., 2006, WORKSHOP INFORM SYST
[8]   Physicians' participation in the Physicians' Quality Reporting Initiative and their perceptions of its impact on quality of care [J].
Federman, Alex D. ;
Keyhani, Salomeh .
HEALTH POLICY, 2011, 102 (2-3) :229-234
[9]   Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets [J].
Forman, Chris ;
Ghose, Anindya ;
Wiesenfeld, Batia .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (03) :291-313
[10]   VOCAL MINORITY AND SILENT MAJORITY: HOW DO ONLINE RATINGS REFLECT POPULATION PERCEPTIONS OF QUALITY [J].
Gao, Guodong ;
Greenwood, Brad N. ;
Agarwal, Ritu ;
McCullough, Jeffrey S. .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2015, 39 (03) :565-+