Radiological Staging for Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients with Confirmed Local and/or Locoregional Recurrence: How Useful are Current Guideline Recommendations?

被引:6
作者
Elfgen, Constanze [1 ]
Schmid, Seraina Margaretha [2 ,3 ]
Tausch, Christoph Johannes [1 ]
Montagna, Giacomo [4 ]
Guth, Uwe [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Brust Zentrum Zurich, Dept Breast Surg, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Locat Spital Grabs, Breast Ctr St Gallen, Grabs, Switzerland
[3] UHB, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Basel, Switzerland
[4] UHB, Breast Ctr, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST; TUMOR RECURRENCE; PROGNOSIS; SURGERY; MASTECTOMY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-019-07629-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Breast cancer patients with local and/or locoregional recurrence (LR) are at higher risk of developing distant metastases (DM) at a later time. Once LR has been confirmed, some international interdisciplinary guidelines recommend performing radiological examinations for DM to determine the course of further therapy (curative or palliative approach). This study analyzed the metastatic patterns of patients with LR with particular regard to the frequency of concurrent diagnosis of LR and DM; in other words: are radiological staging procedures actually justified for DM at the time of diagnosis of LR? Methods This study included all patients (n = 1368) who were diagnosed and treated for nonmetastatic breast cancer (Stage I-III) at the University Women's Hospital Basel, Switzerland between 1990 and 2009. Results In 137 patients, LR was diagnosed without a history of DM: in-breast/thoracic wall only, n = 90 (65.7%); involvement of axillary/supra-/infraclavicular lymph nodes, n = 47 (34.3%). DM was found at the time of diagnosis of LR in 44 patients (32.1%). Concurrent diagnosis of LR and DM occurred significantly more often in patients with lymph node recurrence compared with those with in-breast/chest wall recurrence (48.9% vs. 23.3%; p = 0.004). Conclusions Approximately one-third of patients with a LR had synchronous DM at the time of their local/locoregional event. For this reason, routine systemic staging imaging at the time of LR should be an absolute requirement for planning further therapy. Confirmation of DM may spare the patients radical surgical interventions with questionable impact on survival in the face of an incurable disease.
引用
收藏
页码:3455 / 3461
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Staging for distant metastases in operable breast cancer: a suggested expansion of the ESMO guideline recommendation for staging imaging of node-negative, hormonal receptor-negative disease
    Aebi, S.
    Davidson, T.
    Gruber, G.
    Cardoso, F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 (02) : 555 - 557
  • [2] Disease-related surgery in patients with distant metastatic breast cancer
    Amann, E.
    Huang, D. J.
    Weber, W. P.
    Eppenberger-Castori, S.
    Schmid, S. M.
    Hess, T. H.
    Gueth, U.
    [J]. EJSO, 2013, 39 (11): : 1192 - 1198
  • [3] American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), QUAL GUID BREAST CAN
  • [4] Prognosis After Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence and Locoregional Recurrences in Patients Treated by Breast-Conserving Therapy in Five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols of Node-Negative Breast Cancer
    Anderson, Stewart J.
    Wapnir, Irene
    Dignam, James J.
    Fisher, Bernard
    Mamounas, Eleftherios P.
    Jeong, Jong-Hyeon
    Geyer, Charles E., Jr.
    Wickerham, D. Lawrence
    Costantino, Joseph P.
    Wolmark, Norman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15) : 2466 - 2473
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, LEITLINIENPROGRAMM O
  • [6] Locoregional recurrence after mastectomy: Incidence and outcomes
    Buchanan, Claire L.
    Dorn, Paige L.
    Fey, Jane
    Giron, Gladys
    Naik, Arpana
    Mendez, Jane
    Murphy, Colleen
    Sclafani, Lisa M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2006, 203 (04) : 469 - 474
  • [7] 4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)
    Cardoso, F.
    Senkus, E.
    Costa, A.
    Papadopoulos, E.
    Aapro, M.
    Andre, F.
    Harbeck, N.
    Aguilar Lopez, B.
    Barrios, C. H.
    Bergh, J.
    Biganzoli, L.
    Boers-Doers, C. B.
    Cardoso, M. J.
    Carey, L. A.
    Cortes, J.
    Curigliano, G.
    Dieras, V.
    El Saghir, N. S.
    Eniu, A.
    Fallowfield, L.
    Francis, P. A.
    Gelmon, K.
    Johnston, S. R. D.
    Kaufmann, B.
    Koppikar, S.
    Krop, I. E.
    Mayer, M.
    Nakigudde, G.
    Offersen, B. V.
    Ohno, S.
    Pagani, O.
    Paluch-Shimon, S.
    Penault-Llorca, F.
    Prat, A.
    Rugo, H. S.
    Sledge, G. W.
    Spence, D.
    Thomssen, C.
    Vorobiof, D. A.
    Xu, B.
    Norton, L.
    Winer, E. P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (08) : 1634 - 1657
  • [8] Can Locoregionally Recurrent Breast Cancer Be Cured?
    Chand, Arati Rani
    Ziauddin, M. Firdos
    Tang, Shou-Ching
    [J]. CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2017, 17 (05) : 326 - 335
  • [9] Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials
    Darby S.
    McGale P.
    Correa C.
    Taylor C.
    Arriagada R.
    Clarke M.
    Cutter D.
    Davies C.
    Ewertz M.
    Godwin J.
    Gray R.
    Pierce L.
    Whelan T.
    Wang Y.
    Peto R.
    Albain K.
    Anderson S.
    Barlow W.
    Bergh J.
    Bliss J.
    Buyse M.
    Cameron D.
    Carrasco E.
    Coates A.
    Collins R.
    Costantino J.
    Cuzick J.
    Davidson N.
    Davies K.
    Delmestri A.
    Di Leo A.
    Dowsett M.
    Elphinstone P.
    Evans V.
    Gelber R.
    Gettins L.
    Geyer C.
    Goldhirsch A.
    Gregory C.
    Hayes D.
    Hill C.
    Ingle J.
    Jakesz R.
    James S.
    Kaufmann M.
    Kerr A.
    MacKinnon E.
    McHugh T.
    Norton L.
    Ohashi Y.
    [J]. LANCET, 2011, 378 (9804) : 1707 - 1716
  • [10] PROGNOSIS FOLLOWING LOCAL RECURRENCE IN THE CONSERVATIVELY TREATED BREAST-CANCER PATIENT
    HAFFTY, BG
    FISCHER, D
    BEINFIELD, M
    MCKHANN, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (02): : 293 - 298