Water allocation and governance in multi-stakeholder environments: Insight from Axios Delta, Greece

被引:45
|
作者
Kapetas, Leon [1 ]
Kazakis, Nerantzis [1 ]
Voudouris, Konstantinos [1 ]
McNicholl, Duncan [2 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Geol, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Cambridge, England
关键词
Water allocation; Institutional relationships; Governance; Egocentric network analysis; Environmental flow; DPSIR; TREATED WASTE-WATER; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; RIVER; REUSE; VULNERABILITY; IRRIGATION; MODEL; DPSIR; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133831
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article deals with stakeholders' interactions and institutional capacity influencing water resource management where competitive demands co-exist. For the case study area of Axios Delta, Northern Greece, a water deficit in the agricultural sector, an unmet environmental flow and a reduced capacity for urban supply during drought conditions are observed. An egocentric network analysis based on desk-study and a series of semi-structured stakeholder interviews reveals how weak stakeholder ties lead to ineffective multilevel governance and, as a result, low water efficiency practices. There is a lack of understanding of other users' priorities as well as of the risks related to climate change and/or seasonal variability. This is reflected in the flat rate abstraction licence for agricultural purposes which reduces environmental flow to below acceptable standards. There is no transboundary cooperation between Greece and the Republic of North Macedonia which hinders an integrated management approach. A limited exchange of information to support an evidence-based allocation plan is observed. Suitable interventions identified through a DPSIR approach are evaluated in a multi-criteria analysis considering cost effectiveness, delivered benefits as well as ease of implementation. Suitable technical practices include the development of a local and catchment-scale monitoring network for surface water and groundwater, climate-adaptive agriculture and treated-water reclamation. Updated management policies involve the institutional prioritisation of environmental flow through an adaptive allocation plan as well as the strengthening of transboundary cooperation. This research shows how the coordination of aggregated diverging interests in multilevel multi-stakeholder environments appears to be key in supporting positive water budgets in an uncertain climate future. (c) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Stakeholder engagement in water governance as social learning: lessons from practice
    Wehn, Uta
    Collins, Kevin
    Anema, Kim
    Basco-Carrera, Laura
    Lerebours, Alix
    WATER INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 43 (01) : 34 - 59
  • [42] Illustrating the multi-stakeholder perceptions of environmental pollution based on big data: Lessons from China
    Liu, Haimeng
    Liu, Huaming
    Cheng, Yi
    REGIONAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 3 (01) : 12 - 26
  • [43] From planning to implementation: a multi-stakeholder partnership for managing plant invasions in tropical island ecosystems
    Rouget, Mathieu
    Fenouillas, Pauline
    Cazal, Emilie
    Caubit, Margot
    Ajaguin Soleyen, Cedric
    Balard, Eve
    Becker-Scarpitta, Antoine
    Calichiama, Laurent
    Karczewski, Gael
    Lavergne, Christophe
    Lequette, Benoit
    L'Horset, Roxane
    Marie, Lea
    Payet, Guillaume
    Payet, Nicolas
    Picot, Frederic
    Strasberg, Dominique
    Triolo, Julien
    Turquet, Vincent
    Delorme, Jean-Philippe
    BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2024, 26 (12) : 4381 - 4399
  • [44] Towards a Synergistic Multi-stakeholder Approach to CSR in Crisis: Learning from Large Global Firms' Responses to COVID-19
    Bamiatzi, Vassiliki
    Brieger, Steven A.
    Manning, Stephan
    Shi, Shiqianbao
    Islam, Tahir
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2024, 35 (03) : 1180 - 1197
  • [45] Sustainable assessment of Water-Energy-Food Nexus at regional level through a multi-stakeholder optimization approach
    Cansino-Loeza, Brenda
    Ponce-Ortega, Jose Maria
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 290
  • [46] Multi-stakeholder initiative governance as assemblage: Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil as a political resource in land conflicts related to oil palm plantations
    Michiel Köhne
    Agriculture and Human Values, 2014, 31 : 469 - 480
  • [47] Multi-stakeholder initiative governance as assemblage: Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil as a political resource in land conflicts related to oil palm plantations
    Kohne, Michiel
    AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2014, 31 (03) : 469 - 480
  • [48] Promoting transparency, accountability, and access through a multi-stakeholder initiative: Lessons from the medicines transparency alliance
    Vian T.
    Kohler J.C.
    Forte G.
    Dimancesco D.
    Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, 10 (1)
  • [49] Which firms leave multi-stakeholder initiatives? An analysis of delistings from the United Nations Global Compact
    Rasche, Andreas
    Gwozdz, Wencke
    Larsen, Mathias Lund
    Moon, Jeremy
    REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2022, 16 (01) : 309 - 326
  • [50] The role of a German multi-stakeholder standard for livestock products derived from non-GMO feed
    Venus, Thomas J.
    Drabik, Dusan
    Wesseler, Justus
    FOOD POLICY, 2018, 78 : 58 - 67