Walking After Stroke: What Does Treadmill Training With Body Weight Support Add to Overground Gait Training in Patients Early After Stroke? A Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial

被引:94
作者
Franceschini, Marco [1 ]
Carda, Stefano [2 ]
Agosti, Maurizio [3 ]
Antenucci, Roberto
Malgrati, Daniele [4 ]
Cisari, Carlo [2 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, I-00163 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Div Phys & Rehabilitat Med, Novara, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp Parma, Dept Rehabil Med, Parma, Italy
[4] S Francesco Clin, Rehabil Unit, Bergamo, Italy
关键词
exercise therapy; gait; rehabilitation; stroke; INPATIENT REHABILITATION; PHYSICAL-THERAPY; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.555540
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of gait training using body weight support on a treadmill compared with conventional gait training for people with subacute stroke who were unable to walk. Methods-This was a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up. Ninety-seven subjects were recruited within 6 weeks of stroke onset and were randomly assigned to conventional rehabilitative treatment plus gait training with body weight support on a treadmill (experimental group; n=52) and conventional treatment with overground gait training only (control group; n=45). All subjects were treated in 60-minute sessions every weekday for 4 weeks. Outcome measures were Motricity Index, Trunk Control test, Barthel Index, Functional Ambulation Categories, 10-meter and 6-minute Walk Tests, and Walking Handicap Scale. Assessments were made at baseline, after 20 sessions of treatment, 2 weeks after treatment, and 6 months after stroke. Results-After treatment, all patients were able to walk. Both groups showed improvement in all outcome measures (P<0.0063) at the end of the treatment and at follow-up. No differences were seen between the 2 groups before, during, and after treatment and at follow-up. Conclusions-In subacute patients with stroke, gait training on a treadmill with body weight support is feasible and as effective as conventional gait training. However, the need for more personnel for treadmill training makes the use of robotically assisted systems more compelling. (Stroke. 2009; 40: 3079-3085.)
引用
收藏
页码:3079 / 3085
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[2]  
Bohannon R W, 1991, Int J Rehabil Res, V14, P246, DOI 10.1097/00004356-199109000-00010
[3]  
Carr J., 2003, STROKE REHABILITATIO
[4]   Gait outcomes after acute stroke rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training: A randomized controlled pilot study [J].
da Cunha, IT ;
Lim, PA ;
Qureshy, H ;
Henson, H ;
Monga, T ;
Protas, EJ .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2002, 83 (09) :1258-1265
[5]   Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke [J].
Duncan, P ;
Studenski, S ;
Richards, L ;
Gollub, S ;
Lai, SM ;
Reker, D ;
Perera, S ;
Yates, J ;
Koch, V ;
Rigler, S ;
Johnson, D .
STROKE, 2003, 34 (09) :2173-2180
[6]   Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke [J].
French, B. ;
Thomas, L. H. ;
Leathley, M. J. ;
Sutton, C. J. ;
McAdam, J. ;
Forster, A. ;
Langhorne, P. ;
Price, C. I. M. ;
Walker, A. ;
Watkins, C. L. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (04)
[7]  
Hassid E, 1997, J NEUROL REHABIL, V11, P21
[8]   Gait pattern of severely disabled hemiparetic subjects on a new controlled gait trainer as compared to assisted treadmill walking with partial body weight support [J].
Hesse, S ;
Uhlenbrock, D ;
Sarkodie-Gyan, T .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 1999, 13 (05) :401-410
[9]   TREADMILL TRAINING WITH PARTIAL BODY-WEIGHT SUPPORT COMPARED WITH PHYSIOTHERAPY IN NONAMBULATORY HEMIPARETIC PATIENTS [J].
HESSE, S ;
BERTELT, C ;
JAHNKE, MT ;
SCHAFFRIN, A ;
BAAKE, P ;
MALEZIC, M ;
MAURITZ, KH .
STROKE, 1995, 26 (06) :976-981
[10]   Treadmill walking with partial body weight support versus floor walking in hemiparetic subjects [J].
Hesse, S ;
Konrad, M ;
Uhlenbrock, D .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1999, 80 (04) :421-427