Diagnostic Accuracy of FOBT and Colorectal Cancer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

被引:19
作者
Ramdzan, Abdul Rahman [1 ,2 ]
Abd Rahim, Muhammad Aklil [1 ,2 ]
Zaki, Aznida Mohamad [1 ]
Zaidun, Zuraidah [1 ]
Nawi, Azmawati Mohammed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Med, Dept Community Hlth, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaysia Sabah, Dept Community & Family Med, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
来源
ANNALS OF GLOBAL HEALTH | 2019年 / 85卷 / 01期
关键词
SOCIETY TASK-FORCE; OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; LYNCH-SYNDROME; GUIDELINES; SURVEILLANCE; SENSITIVITY; NEOPLASMS; STATEMENT; SERVICES;
D O I
10.5334/aogh.2466
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer related death in the world after lung cancer. Early detection of CRC leads to improvement in cancer survival rate. In recent years, efforts have been made to discover a non-invasive screening marker of higher sensitivity and specificity. Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and genetic testing become alternative modalities to screen CRC in the population other than colonoscopy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of FOBT and genetic testing as screening tools in colorectal cancer. Methods: A literature search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus was carried out. The search strategy was restricted to human subjects and studies are published in English. Data on sensitivity and specificity were extracted and pooled. Heterogeneity was assumed at significance level of p < 0.10 and was tested by chi squared. Degree of heterogeneity was quantified using the I-2 statistic, and values of less than 25% is considered as homogenous. All analyses were performed using the software Meta-Disc. Results: A total of eleven studies were suitable for data synthesis and analysis. Five studies were analyzed for the accuracy of genetic testing, the pooled estimate for sensitivity and specificity were 71% (95% CI: 66, 75%) and 95% (95% CI: 93, 97%) respectively. Another group of studies which had been evaluated for the accuracy of FOBT, the pooled sensitivity was 31% (95% CI: 25, 38%) while the pooled specificity was 87% (95% CI: 86, 89%). Conclusions: FOBTs is recommended to use as population-based screening tools for colorectal cancer while genetic testing should be focusing on patients with moderate and high risk individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] The Detection of the Methylated Wif-1 Gene Is More Accurate than a Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Amiot, Aurelien
    Mansour, Hicham
    Baumgaertner, Isabelle
    Delchier, Jean-Charles
    Tournigand, Christophe
    Furet, Jean-Pierre
    Carrau, Jean-Pierre
    Canoui-Poitrine, Florence
    Sobhani, Iradj
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (07):
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, COL CANC FACTS FIG 2
  • [3] Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002)
    Cairns, Stuart R.
    Scholefield, John H.
    Steele, Robert J.
    Dunlop, Malcolm G.
    Thomas, Huw J. W.
    Evans, Gareth D.
    Eaden, Jayne A.
    Rutter, Matthew D.
    Atkin, Wendy P.
    Saunders, Brian P.
    Lucassen, Anneke
    Jenkins, Paul
    Fairclough, Peter D.
    Woodhouse, Christopher R. J.
    [J]. GUT, 2010, 59 (05) : 666 - 689
  • [4] lmmunohistochemistry with the anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody: impact of pre-analytical conditions and concordance with DNA sequencing in colorectal and papillary thyroid carcinoma
    Dvorak, Katerina
    Aggeler, Birte
    Palting, John
    McKelvie, Penny
    Ruszkiewicz, Andrew
    Waring, Paul
    [J]. PATHOLOGY, 2014, 46 (06) : 509 - 517
  • [5] The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios of fecal occult blood test for the detection of colorectal cancer in hospital settings
    Elsafi, Salah H.
    Alqahtani, Norah I.
    Zakary, Nawaf Y.
    Al Zahrani, Eidan M.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 8 : 279 - 284
  • [6] Fuzi SAM, 2012, HLTH TECHNOLOGY ASSE
  • [7] Guidelines on Genetic Evaluation and Management of Lynch Syndrome: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer
    Giardiello, Francis M.
    Allen, John I.
    Axilbund, Jennifer E.
    Boland, C. Richard
    Burke, Carol A.
    Burt, Randall W.
    Church, James M.
    Dominitz, Jason A.
    Johnson, David A.
    Kaltenbach, Tonya
    Levin, Theodore R.
    Lieberman, David A.
    Robertson, Douglas J.
    Syngal, Sapna
    Rex, Douglas K.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (08) : 1025 - 1048
  • [8] Cancer genetics services: a systematic review of the economic evidence and issues
    Griffith, GL
    Edwards, RT
    Gray, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 90 (09) : 1697 - 1703
  • [9] Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult
    Hewitson, P.
    Glasziou, P.
    Irwig, L.
    Towler, B.
    Watson, E.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (01):
  • [10] Systematic review with meta-analysis: faecal occult blood tests show lower colorectal cancer detection rates in the proximal colon in colonoscopy-verified diagnostic studies
    Hirai, H. W.
    Tsoi, K. K. F.
    Chan, J. Y. C.
    Wong, S. H.
    Ching, J. Y. L.
    Wong, M. C. S.
    Wu, J. C. Y.
    Chan, F. K. L.
    Sung, J. J. Y.
    Ng, S. C.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 43 (07) : 755 - 764