Establishing clinically significant outcome thresholds for the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 2 years following total shoulder arthroplasty

被引:27
作者
Cohn, Matthew R. [1 ]
Kunze, Kyle N. [1 ]
Polce, Evan M. [1 ]
Nemsick, Michael [1 ]
Garrigues, Grant E. [1 ]
Forsythe, Brian [1 ]
Nicholson, Gregory P. [1 ]
Cole, Brian J. [1 ]
Verma, Nikhil N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Midwest Orthoped Rush, Dept Orthoped, Div Sports Med & Shoulder, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Clinical outcomes; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE); total shoulder arthroplasty; minimal clinically important difference (MCID); substantial clinical benefit (SCB); patient-reported outcome instrument validation;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.011
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) is a simple, time-efficient patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) used to assess postoperative shoulder function. Clinically significant outcome values and ability to correlate with longer legacy PROM scores at 2 years following shoulder arthroplasty are unknown. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using SANE, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and Constant scores that were collected at a minimum 2-year follow-up. A total of 153 patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) were included. A distribution-based method was used to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). An anchor-based method was used to determine substantial clinical benefit (SCB). The following anchor question was collected alongside the PROMs and graded on a 15-point Lik-ert-type scale to establish the SCB: "Since your surgery, has there been any change in the pain in your shoulder?'' Linear regression was used to assess correlations between PROMs. Results: SANE showed moderate correlation with ASES (R-2 = 0.493) and Constant (R-2 = 0.586) scores (P < .001). The MCID value was 14.9, and the SCB absolute value was 80.4 (area under the curve = 0.663) for SANE. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that patients undergoing RTSA were less likely to achieve SCB on all 3 outcome measures (P < .02). Conclusions: This study establishes concurrent construct validity for SANE and suggests that it is a valid metric to assess the MCID and SCB at 2 years following anatomic TSA and RTSA. SANE demonstrated moderate correlations with ASES and Constant scores. Patients undergoing RTSA demonstrated a lower propensity to achieve SCB at 2 years postoperatively compared with anatomic TSA. (C) 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E137 / E146
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Concurrent validity of the single assessment numerical evaluation and patient-reported functional measures in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: An observational study [J].
Alessandra, Garcia N. ;
Cook, Chad ;
Lutz, Adam ;
Thigpen, Charles A. .
MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2019, 44
[2]  
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Assessment Form, 2006, J ORTHOP TRAUMA, V20, pS114
[3]   Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for Microfracture of the Knee: A Psychometric Analysis at Short-term Follow-up [J].
Chahla, Jorge ;
Kunze, Kyle N. ;
Tauro, Tracy ;
Wright-Chisem, Joshua ;
Williams, Brady T. ;
Beletsky, Alexander ;
Yanke, Adam B. ;
Cole, Brian J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (04) :876-883
[4]  
Chughtai Morad, 2016, Surg Technol Int, V28, P280
[5]  
CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160
[6]   Correlation Between American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation Score After Rotator Cuff or SLAP Repair [J].
Cunningham, Gregory ;
Laedermann, Alexandre ;
Denard, Patrick J. ;
Kherad, Omar ;
Burkhart, Stephen S. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (09) :1688-1692
[7]   Outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as primary versus revision procedure for proximal humerus fractures [J].
Dezfuli, Bobby ;
King, Joseph J. ;
Farmer, Kevin W. ;
Struk, Aimee M. ;
Wright, Thomas W. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (07) :1133-1137
[8]  
Flurin PH, 2013, BULL HOSP JT DIS, V71, pS101
[9]  
Friedman R, 2013, B HOSP JOINT DIS ORT, V73, pS111
[10]  
Friedman Richard J, 2019, JSES Open Access, V3, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.jses.2019.09.010