Establishing clinically significant outcome thresholds for the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 2 years following total shoulder arthroplasty

被引:27
作者
Cohn, Matthew R. [1 ]
Kunze, Kyle N. [1 ]
Polce, Evan M. [1 ]
Nemsick, Michael [1 ]
Garrigues, Grant E. [1 ]
Forsythe, Brian [1 ]
Nicholson, Gregory P. [1 ]
Cole, Brian J. [1 ]
Verma, Nikhil N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Midwest Orthoped Rush, Dept Orthoped, Div Sports Med & Shoulder, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Clinical outcomes; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE); total shoulder arthroplasty; minimal clinically important difference (MCID); substantial clinical benefit (SCB); patient-reported outcome instrument validation;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.011
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) is a simple, time-efficient patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) used to assess postoperative shoulder function. Clinically significant outcome values and ability to correlate with longer legacy PROM scores at 2 years following shoulder arthroplasty are unknown. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using SANE, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and Constant scores that were collected at a minimum 2-year follow-up. A total of 153 patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) were included. A distribution-based method was used to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). An anchor-based method was used to determine substantial clinical benefit (SCB). The following anchor question was collected alongside the PROMs and graded on a 15-point Lik-ert-type scale to establish the SCB: "Since your surgery, has there been any change in the pain in your shoulder?'' Linear regression was used to assess correlations between PROMs. Results: SANE showed moderate correlation with ASES (R-2 = 0.493) and Constant (R-2 = 0.586) scores (P < .001). The MCID value was 14.9, and the SCB absolute value was 80.4 (area under the curve = 0.663) for SANE. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that patients undergoing RTSA were less likely to achieve SCB on all 3 outcome measures (P < .02). Conclusions: This study establishes concurrent construct validity for SANE and suggests that it is a valid metric to assess the MCID and SCB at 2 years following anatomic TSA and RTSA. SANE demonstrated moderate correlations with ASES and Constant scores. Patients undergoing RTSA demonstrated a lower propensity to achieve SCB at 2 years postoperatively compared with anatomic TSA. (C) 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E137 / E146
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Concurrent validity of the single assessment numerical evaluation and patient-reported functional measures in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: An observational study
    Alessandra, Garcia N.
    Cook, Chad
    Lutz, Adam
    Thigpen, Charles A.
    [J]. MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2019, 44
  • [2] American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Assessment Form, 2006, J ORTHOP TRAUMA, V20, pS114
  • [3] Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for Microfracture of the Knee: A Psychometric Analysis at Short-term Follow-up
    Chahla, Jorge
    Kunze, Kyle N.
    Tauro, Tracy
    Wright-Chisem, Joshua
    Williams, Brady T.
    Beletsky, Alexander
    Yanke, Adam B.
    Cole, Brian J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (04) : 876 - 883
  • [4] Chughtai Morad, 2016, Surg Technol Int, V28, P280
  • [5] CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160
  • [6] Correlation Between American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation Score After Rotator Cuff or SLAP Repair
    Cunningham, Gregory
    Laedermann, Alexandre
    Denard, Patrick J.
    Kherad, Omar
    Burkhart, Stephen S.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (09) : 1688 - 1692
  • [7] Outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as primary versus revision procedure for proximal humerus fractures
    Dezfuli, Bobby
    King, Joseph J.
    Farmer, Kevin W.
    Struk, Aimee M.
    Wright, Thomas W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (07) : 1133 - 1137
  • [8] Flurin PH, 2013, B HOSP JT DIS, V73, pS118
  • [9] Flurin PH, 2013, BULL HOSP JT DIS, V71, pS101
  • [10] Friedman R, 2013, B HOSP JOINT DIS ORT, V73, pS111