Device uncertainty propagation in low-ductility RC frames retrofitted with BRBs for seismic risk mitigation

被引:21
作者
Freddi, Fabio [1 ]
Ghosh, Jayadipta [2 ]
Kotoky, Needhi [3 ]
Raghunandan, Meera [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Civil Environm & Geomat Engn, London, England
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[3] Natl Inst Technol Meghalaya, Dept Civil Engn, Shillong, Meghalaya, India
关键词
buckling‐ restrained braces; fragility curves; reinforced concrete frames; seismic devices uncertainty; seismic retrofit; seismic risk variability; REINFORCED-CONCRETE FRAMES; OF-THE-ART; EXPERIMENTAL PERFORMANCE; FRAGILITY ASSESSMENT; GRAVITY LOADS; MODEL; VULNERABILITY; CAPACITY; DISTRIBUTIONS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.3456
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Passive control systems, such as buckling-restrained braces (BRBs), have emerged as efficient tools for seismic response control of new and existing structures by imparting strength and stiffness to buildings, while providing additional high and stable energy dissipation capacity. Systems equipped with BRBs have been widely investigated in literature; however, only a deterministic description of the BRBs' properties is typically considered. These properties are provided by the manufacturer and are successively validated by qualification control tests according to code-based tolerance limits. Therefore, the device properties introduced within the structure could differ from their nominal design estimates, potentially leading to an undesired seismic performance. This study proposes a probabilistic assessment framework to evaluate the influence of BRBs' uncertainty on the seismic response of a retrofitted RC frame. For the case study, a benchmark three-story RC moment-resisting frame is considered where BRBs' uncertainty is defined compatible to the standardized tolerance limits of devices' quality control tests. This uncertainty is implemented through a two-level factorial design strategy and Latin hypercube sampling technique. Cloud analysis and probabilistic seismic demand models are used to develop fragility functions for the bare and retrofitted frame for four damage states while also accounting for the uncertainty in the property of BRBs. Risk estimates are successively evaluated for three case study regions. The results show that, for the considered case study structure, these uncertainties could lead to an increase of fragility up to 21% and a variation in seismic risk estimates up to 56%.
引用
收藏
页码:2488 / 2509
页数:22
相关论文
共 57 条
[31]   Seismic behavior of viscously damped yielding frames under structural and damping uncertainties [J].
Lavan, O. ;
Avishur, M. .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2013, 11 (06) :2309-2332
[32]   Choosing the Sample Size of a Computer Experiment: A Practical Guide [J].
Loeppky, Jason L. ;
Sacks, Jerome ;
Welch, William J. .
TECHNOMETRICS, 2009, 51 (04) :366-376
[33]  
McKenna F., 2006, OPEN SYSTEM EARTHQUA
[34]  
Morfuni F., 2019, P 13 INT C APPL STAT
[35]   Pseudodynamic Test of a Deficient RC Frame Strengthened with Buckling Restrained Braces [J].
Ozcelik, Ramazan ;
Erdil, Elif Firuze .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2019, 35 (03) :1163-1187
[36]  
Panagiotakos TB, 2001, ACI STRUCT J, V98, P135
[37]  
Paulay T, 1992, Seismic design of reinforced concrete and mansory buildings, in
[38]   Analytical expressions for preliminary design of dissipative bracing systems in steel frames [J].
Ragni, Laura ;
Zona, Alessandro ;
Dall'Asta, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2011, 67 (01) :102-113
[39]   Probabilistic seismic risk assessment of India [J].
Rao, Anirudh ;
Dutta, Debashish ;
Kalita, Pratim ;
Ackerley, Nick ;
Silva, Vitor ;
Raghunandan, Meera ;
Ghosh, Jayadipta ;
Ghosh, Siddhartha ;
Brzev, Svetlana ;
Dasgupta, Kaustubh .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2020, 36 (1_SUPPL) :345-371
[40]   Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data [J].
Rossetto, T ;
Elnashai, A .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2003, 25 (10) :1241-1263