A random forest classifier for protein-protein docking models

被引:5
|
作者
Barradas-Bautista, Didier [1 ]
Cao, Zhen [1 ]
Vangone, Anna [2 ]
Oliva, Romina [3 ]
Cavallo, Luigi [1 ]
Gromiha, Michael
机构
[1] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol KAUST, Kaust Catalysis Ctr, Phys Sci & Engn Div, Thuwal 239556900, Saudi Arabia
[2] Roche Innovat Ctr Munich Large Mol Res, Pharm Res & Early Dev, Therapeut Modal, D-82377 Penzberg, Germany
[3] Univ Parthenope Naples, Ctr Direzionale Isola C4, Dept Sci & Technol, I-80143 Naples, Italy
来源
BIOINFORMATICS ADVANCES | 2022年 / 2卷 / 01期
关键词
INTER-RESIDUE CONTACTS; PREDICTION; COMPLEXES; FEATURES; RANKING; ELECTROSTATICS; CONSERVATION; REFINEMENT; POTENTIALS; AFFINITY;
D O I
10.1093/bioadv/vbab042
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Herein, we present the results of a machine learning approach we developed to single out correct 3D docking models of protein-protein complexes obtained by popular docking software. To this aim, we generated 3x104 docking models for each of the 230 complexes in the protein-protein benchmark, version 5, using three different docking programs (HADDOCK, FTDock and ZDOCK), for a cumulative set of approximate to 7x106 docking models. Three different machine learning approaches (Random Forest, Supported Vector Machine and Perceptron) were used to train classifiers with 158 different scoring functions (features). The Random Forest algorithm outperformed the other two algorithms and was selected for further optimization. Using a features selection algorithm, and optimizing the random forest hyperparameters, allowed us to train and validate a random forest classifier, named COnservation Driven Expert System (CoDES). Testing of CoDES on independent datasets, as well as results of its comparative performance with machine learning methods recently developed in the field for the scoring of docking decoys, confirm its state-of-the-art ability to discriminate correct from incorrect decoys both in terms of global parameters and in terms of decoys ranked at the top positions.Supplementary information are available at Bioinformatics Advances online.Software and data availability statement The docking models are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4012018. The programs underlying this article will be shared on request to the corresponding authors.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IChemPIC: A Random Forest Classifier of Biological and Crystallographic Protein-Protein Interfaces
    Da Silva, Franck
    Desaphy, Jeremy
    Bret, Guillaume
    Rognan, Didier
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2015, 55 (09) : 2005 - 2014
  • [2] A significance score for protein-protein interaction models through random docking
    McCoy, Katherine Maia
    Ackerman, Margaret E.
    Grigoryan, Gevorg
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2024, 33 (02)
  • [3] DockQ: A Quality Measure for Protein-Protein Docking Models
    Basu, Sankar
    Wallner, Bjorn
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (08):
  • [4] Protein-Protein Docking
    Ehrlich, Lutz P.
    Wade, Rebecca C.
    REVIEWS IN COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 17, 2001, 17 : 61 - 97
  • [5] Residue Environment Score for Selecting Protein Structure Models and Protein-Protein Docking Models
    Kim, HyungRae
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 110 (03) : 346A - 346A
  • [6] Finding correct protein-protein docking models using ProQDock
    Basu, Sankar
    Wallner, Bjorn
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 32 (12) : 262 - 270
  • [7] A protein-protein docking benchmark
    Chen, R
    Mintseris, J
    Janin, J
    Weng, ZP
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 52 (01): : 88 - 91
  • [8] ELECTROSTATICS IN PROTEIN-PROTEIN DOCKING
    Eisenstein, M.
    Heifetz, A.
    Katchalski-Katzir, E.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 1999, 55 : 96 - 96
  • [9] Electrostatics in protein-protein docking
    Heifetz, A
    Katchalski-Katzir, E
    Eisenstein, M
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2002, 11 (03) : 571 - 587
  • [10] Flexible protein-protein docking
    Bonvin, AM
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (02) : 194 - 200