Proton beam radiotherapy vs. radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized phase III trial

被引:136
|
作者
Kim, Tae Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Koh, Young Hwan [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Bo Hyun [1 ]
Kim, Min Ju [3 ]
Lee, Ju Hee [1 ,3 ]
Park, Boram [4 ]
Park, Joong-Won [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Ctr Liver & Pancreatobiliary Canc, Goyang, South Korea
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Ctr Proton Therapy, Goyang, South Korea
[3] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Goyang, South Korea
[4] Natl Canc Ctr, Res Core Ctr, Biostat Collaborat Team, Goyang, South Korea
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Radiofrequency ablation: proton beam therapy; local progression-free survival; Randomised controlled trial; SURGICAL RESECTION; RADIATION-THERAPY; THERMAL ABLATION; HEPATECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINE; DIAGNOSIS; DEATH; CM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhep.2020.09.026
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) has recently been applied to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, there is no randomized controlled trial-based evidence on its safety and efficacy. We compared the outcomes of PBT and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with recurrent/residual HCC (rHCC) in a phase III non-inferiority trial. Methods: Patients with rHCC (size <3 cm, number <-2) were randomly assigned to receive PBT or RFA according to Child-Pugh score and tumor stage. After randomization, if the assigned treatment was technically infeasible, crossover was allowed. The primary endpoint was 2-year local progression-free survival (LPFS), with a non-inferiority margin of 15% in the per-protocol (PP) population; a complementary analysis was performed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (NCT01963429). Results: The ITT population comprised 144 patients receiving either PBT (n = 72) or RFA (n = 72). Six patients switched from the PBT arm to the RFA arm and 19 patients switched from the RFA arm to the PBT arm. In the PP population, the 2-year LPFS rate with PBT (n = 80) vs. RFA (n = 56) was 94.8% vs. 83.9%, a difference of 10.9 percentage points (90% CI 1.8-20.0; p < 0.001); in the ITT population, the 2-year LPFS rate with PBT vs. RFA was 92.8% vs. 83.2%, a difference of 9.6 percentage points (90% CI 0.7-18.4; p < 0.001), meeting the criteria for non-inferiority. The 3- and 4 year LPFS rates for PBT were also non-inferior to those for RFA. The most common adverse events were radiation pneumonitis (32.5%) and decreased leukocyte counts (23.8%) for PBT and increased alanine aminotransferase levels (96.4%) and abdominal pain (30.4%) for RFA. No Grade 4 adverse events or mortality were noted. Conclusions: PBT showed LPFS values that were non-inferior to those for RFA; in addition, PBT was tolerable and safe. Lay summary: Radiofrequency ablation is the standard of care for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma in whom surgery is not feasible. This study is the first phase III randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical outcomes of proton beam radiotherapy vs. radiofrequency ablation in patients with recurrent small HCC. Our findings show that this new technique is not inferior and can be applied safely in patients with small recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. (C) 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 612
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Safety and Efficacy of High-Dose Proton Beam Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Prospective Trial
    Bush, David A.
    Kayali, Zeid
    Grove, Roger
    Slater, Jerry D.
    CANCER, 2011, 117 (13) : 3053 - 3059
  • [22] Radiofrequency ablation combined with toripalimab for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective controlled trial
    Wen, Zhenyu
    Wang, Junxiao
    Tu, Bo
    Liu, Yane
    Yang, Yuqing
    Hou, Li
    Yang, Xiang
    Liu, Xiaoyan
    Xie, Hui
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (20): : 20311 - 20320
  • [23] Hepatocellular carcinomas 2-3 cm in diameter: Transarterial chemoembolization plus radiofrequency ablation vs. radiofrequency ablation alone
    Kim, Jong Woo
    Kim, Jin Hyoung
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    Yoon, Hyun-Ki
    Sung, Kyu-Bo
    Kim, Pyo Nyun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (03) : E189 - E193
  • [24] Treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma confined to the liver with repeated resection and radiofrequency ablation: A single center experience
    Eisele, R. M.
    Chopra, S. S.
    Lock, J. F.
    Glanemann, M.
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2013, 21 (01) : 9 - 18
  • [25] Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Surgical Resection for Patients With Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Smaller Than 5 cm
    Zheng, Lei
    Zhang, Chi-Hao
    Lin, Jia-Yun
    Song, Chen-Lu
    Qi, Xiao-Liang
    Luo, Meng
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [26] Laparoscopic liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: randomized clinical trial
    Song, Juxian
    Cao, Li
    Ma, Kuansheng
    Li, Jianwei
    Wang, Xiaojun
    Chen, Jian
    Zheng, Shuguo
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111 (04)
  • [27] Radiofrequency Ablation With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Peng, Zhen-Wei
    Zhang, Yao-Jun
    Chen, Min-Shan
    Xu, Li
    Liang, Hui-Hong
    Lin, Xiao-Jun
    Guo, Rong-Ping
    Zhang, Ya-Qi
    Lau, Wan Yee
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (04) : 426 - 432
  • [28] Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Surgical Resection on the Treatment of Patients with Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A System Review and Meta-Analysis sf Five Randomized Controlled Trials
    Fu, Chunchuan
    Liu, Nianzhou
    Deng, Qingsong
    Li, Xiaowu
    Ma, Kuansheng
    Bie, Ping
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 61 (134) : 1722 - 1729
  • [29] The current role of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of intrahepatic recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma
    Fu, Rong
    Ling, Wenwu
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 128 (08) : 1340 - 1346
  • [30] Phase II study of radiotherapy employing proton beam for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Kawashima, M
    Furuse, J
    Nishio, T
    Konishi, M
    Ishii, H
    Kinoshita, T
    Nagase, M
    Nihei, KI
    Ogino, T
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (09) : 1839 - 1846