Tools for the prioritization of substances on the Domestic Substances List in Canada on the basis of hazard

被引:12
|
作者
Hughes, K. [1 ]
Paterson, J. [1 ]
Meek, M. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Canada, Safe Environm Directorate, Existing Subst Div, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada
关键词
Risk assessment; Prioritization; Categorization; Hazard; Tools;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.09.007
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
A precedent setting legislative mandate under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act 1999 to establish priorities for assessment based on systematic consideration of all of the approximately 23,000 Existing Chemicals in Canada required the development and refinement of methodology in a number of important areas. This included development of simple and complex exposure and hazard tools for priority setting which draw maximally and efficiently on available data to systematically identify substances that are highest priorities in relation to their potential to cause adverse effects on the general population. The hierarchical approach in the simple and complex hazard tools described here efficiently and effectively sets substances aside as non-priorities, or prioritizes them for consideration additionally in assessment. The hazard tools efficiently incorporate previous work, contributing to consistency internationally, and involve hierarchical consideration of sources of information based on their relative weighting. They are health protective, based on their incorporated degree of conservatism, and provide direction for additional assessment for substances deemed to be priorities. Although designed for prioritization of Existing Substances in Canada, these tools have potential for broader application in other national and international programs to provide focus and increase efficiency in human health risk assessment. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 393
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [21] HIGHER HAZARD SUBSTANCES UNDER THE MASSACHUSETTS TOXICS USE REDUCTION ACT: LESSONS FROM THE FIRST FOUR YEARS
    Massey, Rachel I.
    Tenney, Heather
    Harriman, Elizabeth
    NEW SOLUTIONS-A JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH POLICY, 2011, 21 (03) : 457 - 476
  • [22] Inconsistent health hazard information across safety data sheets for substances in cleaning products used in healthcare centres
    Lee, Sewon
    Povey, Andrew
    Seed, Martin
    van Tongeren, Martie
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (15)
  • [23] Application of Screening Tools for Environmental Hazard and Risk to Support Assessment and Subsequent Prioritization of Effluent Discharges from the Oil and Gas Industry
    Worden, Joy R.
    Di Paolo, Carolina
    Whale, Graham F.
    Eadsforth, Charles, V
    Michie, Eleanor
    Lindgren, Avila
    Smit, Mathijs Gd
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 17 (05) : 1025 - 1036
  • [24] Global occurrence and probabilistic environmental health hazard assessment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in groundwater and surface waters
    Sims, Jaylen L.
    Stroski, Kevin M.
    Kim, Sujin
    Killeen, Grace
    Ehalt, Ricardo
    Simcik, Matt F.
    Brooks, Bryan W.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 816
  • [25] (Q)SAR tools for priority setting: A case study with printed paper and board food contact material substances
    Van Bossuyt, Melissa
    Van Hoeck, Els
    Raitano, Giuseppa
    Manganelli, Serena
    Braeken, Els
    Ates, Gamze
    Vanhaecke, Tamara
    Van Miert, Sabine
    Benfenati, Emilio
    Mertens, Birgit
    Rogiers, Vera
    FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 102 : 109 - 119
  • [27] The environmental neuroactive chemicals list of prioritized substances for human biomonitoring and neurotoxicity testing: A database and high-throughput toxicokinetics approach
    Rager, Julia E.
    Koval, Lauren E.
    Hickman, Elise
    Ring, Caroline
    Teitelbaum, Taylor
    Cohen, Todd
    Fragola, Giulia
    Zylka, Mark J.
    Engel, Lawrence S.
    Lu, Kun
    Engel, Stephanie M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2025, 266