Adaptation of Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Model of Training Criteria to Evaluate Training Programmes for Head Teachers

被引:37
作者
Alsalamah, Aljawharah [1 ]
Callinan, Carol [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lincoln, Sch Educ, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
来源
EDUCATION SCIENCES | 2021年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
Kirkpatrick model; assessment; evaluation; training programme; head teachers; LEARNING OUTCOMES; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.3390/educsci11030116
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Training programmes are evaluated to verify their effectiveness, assess their ability to achieve their goals and identify the areas that require improvement. Therefore, the target of evaluators is to develop an appropriate framework for evaluating training programmes. This study adapted Kirkpatrick's four-level model of training criteria published in 1959 to evaluate training programmes for head teachers according to their own perceptions and those of their supervisors. The adapted model may help evaluators to conceptualise the assessment of learning outcomes of training programmes with metrics and instruments. The model also helps to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the training process. The adaptation includes concrete metrics and instruments for each of the four levels in the model: reaction criteria, learning criteria, behaviour criteria and results criteria. The adapted model was applied to evaluate 12 training programmes for female head teachers in Saudi Arabia. The study sample comprised 250 trainee head teachers and 12 supervisors. The results indicated that the adapted Kirkpatrick evaluation model was very effective in evaluating educational training for head teachers.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 131 条
  • [1] Abukiosk M., 2006, CONT SCH ADM, V1st
  • [2] Benefits of Training and Development for Individuals and Teams, Organizations, and Society
    Aguinis, Herman
    Kraiger, Kurt
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 : 451 - 474
  • [3] Albabtain A., 2019, J ED SCI IMAM MUHAMM, V17, P479
  • [4] Albahussain S.A., 2000, THESIS U BRADFORD BR
  • [5] Allen M., 2006, ASSESSING GEN ED PRO
  • [6] KIRKPATRICK LEVELS OF TRAINING CRITERIA - 30 YEARS LATER
    ALLIGER, GM
    JANAK, EA
    [J]. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 42 (02) : 331 - 342
  • [7] A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria
    Alliger, GM
    Tannenbaum, SI
    Bennett, W
    Traver, H
    Shotland, A
    [J]. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 50 (02) : 341 - 358
  • [8] Almilhi A., 2010, MODERN TRAINING METH
  • [9] Alsalamah A., 2020, ATHENS J, V7, P1, DOI [10.30958/aje.7-4-5, DOI 10.30958/AJE.7-4-5]
  • [10] Alvarez K., 2004, HUM RESOUR DEV REV, V3, P385, DOI DOI 10.1177/1534484304270820