Bowling Together: Scientific Collaboration Networks of Demographers at European Population Conferences

被引:5
作者
Abel, Guy J. [1 ,2 ]
Muttarak, Raya [2 ,3 ]
Bordone, Valeria [4 ]
Zagheni, Emilio [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, ADRI, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Wittgenstein Ctr Demog & Global Human Capital, IIASA, VID OAW,WU, Schlosspl 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
[3] Univ East Anglia, Sch Int Dev, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[4] Univ Munich, Dept Sociol, Munich, Germany
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Sociol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Max Planck Inst Demog Res, Rostock, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POPULATION-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE DEMOGRAPHIE | 2019年 / 35卷 / 03期
关键词
Demography; Population studies; Scientific collaboration; Collaboration networks; PUBLICATION PRODUCTIVITY; SOCIAL-SCIENCES; SEX-DIFFERENCES; CO-AUTHORSHIP; MOBILITY; PATTERNS; PUBLISH; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s10680-018-9493-1
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Studies of collaborative networks of demographers are relatively scarce. Similar studies in other social sciences provide insight into scholarly trends of both the fields and characteristics of their successful scientists. Exploiting a unique database of metadata for papers presented at six European Population Conferences, this report explores factors explaining research collaboration among demographers. We find that (1) collaboration among demographers has increased over the past 10 years, however, among co-authored papers, collaboration across institutions remains relatively unchanged over the period, (2) papers based on core demographic subfields such as fertility, mortality, migration and data and methods are more likely to involve multiple authors and (3) multiple author teams that are all female are less likely to co-author with colleagues in different institutions. Potential explanations for these results are discussed alongside comparisons with similar studies of collaboration networks in other related social sciences.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 562
页数:20
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Gender differences in research collaboration [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ;
Murgia, Gianluca .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2013, 7 (04) :811-822
[2]   The rise of research networks [J].
Adams, Jonathan .
NATURE, 2012, 490 (7420) :335-336
[3]   Policy Journal Trends and Tensions: JPAM and PSJ [J].
Adams, William C. ;
Infeld, Donna Lind ;
Minnichelli, Laura F. ;
Ruddell, Michael W. .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2014, 42 :S118-S137
[4]   Non-tenured post-doctoral researchers' job mobility and research output: An analysis of the role of research discipline, department size, and coauthors [J].
Baeker, Agnes .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (03) :634-650
[5]   Optimal predictive model selection [J].
Barbieri, MM ;
Berger, JO .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2004, 32 (03) :870-897
[7]  
Burch T. K., 2018, MODEL BASED DEMOGRAP, P21, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-65433-1_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-65433-1_2]
[9]   How many authors does it take to publish an article? Trends and patterns in political science [J].
Fisher, BS ;
Cobane, CT ;
Vander Ven, TM ;
Cullen, FT .
PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 1998, 31 (04) :847-856
[10]   Scientific mobility and knowledge networks in high emigration countries: Evidence from the Pacific [J].
Gibson, John ;
McKenzie, David .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (09) :1486-1495