Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges

被引:6
作者
Maki, Kristin G. [1 ]
Shete, Sanjay [2 ,3 ]
Volk, Robert J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, 1515 Holcombe Blvd,Unit 1444, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, 1400 Pressler St,Unit 1411, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Canc Prevent & Populat Sci, 1400 Pressler St,Unit 1411, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Lung cancer screening; National datasets; Secondary analysis; Patient-provider communication; Review article; DOSE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; NATIONAL-HEALTH; UNITED-STATES; PATIENT; RISK; CT; PERCEPTIONS; MORTALITY; SMOKING; RECOMMENDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research?including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication?are addressed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[2]  
American Cancer Society, 2020, KEY STAT LUNG CANC
[3]  
American Cancer Society, 2019, LUNG CANC SCREEN GUI
[4]   Longitudinal predictors of adherence to annual follow-up in a lung cancer screening programme [J].
AWildstein, Kimberly ;
Faustini, Yolanda ;
Yip, Rowena ;
Henschke, Claudia I. ;
Ostroff, Jamie S. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2011, 18 (03) :154-159
[5]   Benefits and Harms of CT Screening for Lung Cancer A Systematic Review [J].
Bach, Peter B. ;
Mirkin, Joshua N. ;
Oliver, Thomas K. ;
Azzoli, Christopher G. ;
Berry, Donald A. ;
Brawley, Otis W. ;
Byers, Tim ;
Colditz, Graham A. ;
Gould, Michael K. ;
Jett, James R. ;
Sabichi, Anita L. ;
Smith-Bindman, Rebecca ;
Wood, Douglas E. ;
Qaseem, Amir ;
Detterbeck, Frank C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (22) :2418-2429
[6]   Cumulative social risk exposure and risk of cancer mortality in adulthood [J].
Caleyachetty, Rishi ;
Tehranifar, Parisa ;
Genkinger, Jeanine M. ;
Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B. ;
Muennig, Peter .
BMC CANCER, 2015, 15
[7]   Patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening pre- and post-guidelines: Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) [J].
Carter-Harris, Lisa ;
Tan, Andy S. L. ;
Salloum, Ramzi G. ;
Young-Wolff, Kelly C. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2016, 99 (11) :1772-1777
[8]   Using Risk Models to Make Lung Cancer Screening Decisions: Evidence-Based and Getting Better [J].
Caverly, Tanner J. ;
Meza, Rafael .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 171 (09) :669-+
[9]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2015, DEC MEM SCREEN LUNG
[10]  
Chalian Hamid, 2019, Aging Med (Milton), V2, P35, DOI 10.1002/agm2.12053