Processes and outcomes of head and neck cancer patients from geographically disparate regions of the UK. A comparison of Scottish and English cohorts

被引:14
作者
MacKenzie, K. [1 ,2 ]
Savage, S. A. H. [1 ]
Birchall, M. A.
机构
[1] Glasgow Royal Infirm, W Scotland Managed Clin Network Head & Neck Canc, Glasgow G4 0SF, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirm, Dept Otolaryngol & Head & Neck Surg, Glasgow G31 2ER, Lanark, Scotland
来源
EJSO | 2009年 / 35卷 / 10期
关键词
Head and neck cancer; Audit; Outcomes; Survival; STANDARDS; SOUTH; WEST; MANAGEMENT; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; AUDIT; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2009.04.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this paper was to compare demographics, treatment and outcomes from two large prospective audits of head and neck cancer patients in two disparate regions of the UK. Methods: In the Scottish Audit of Head and Neck Cancer (SAHNC) a total of 1910 patients with new head and neck cancers were registered in a two year period from September 1999 to August 2001. The South and West Audit of Head and Neck Cancer (SWAHN) was carried out in three phases between 1996 and 2002 with a total of 2050 cases. Results: There were more men in SAHNC than SWAHN (71% vs 67%, p < 0.01) and patients in SAHNC presented at a younger age (76% aged 45-74 compared with 64%, p < 0.001). Significantly more patients in Scotland had advanced (stage III/IV) laryngeal cancer (44% vs 30%, p < 0.001). The overall disease specific five year survival was 54.5 for SAHNC and 54.2 for SWAHN. Conclusion: This comparison of large head and neck cancer cohorts provides important data to base UK head and neck cancer care and hypotheses regarding pathogenesis and the effects of treatment processes. Given the heterogeneity in disease, patient and healthcare characteristics between the two regions, the similarities in survival and process outcomes are striking. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1113 / 1118
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Data from head and neck cancer CT atlas (head-neck-CT-atlas)
[2]  
BAILEY D, 2005, 3 HEAD NECK AUDIT RE
[3]   Effect of process standards on survival of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England [J].
Birchall, M ;
Bailey, D ;
King, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (08) :1477-1481
[4]   Consensus standards for the process of cancer care: a modified expert panel method applied to head and neck cancer [J].
Birchall, MA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 77 (11) :1926-1931
[5]  
Birchall MA, 1997, CONSENSUS STANDARDS
[6]   Performance and standards for the process of head and neck cancer care: South and West audit of head and neck cancer 1996-1997 (SWAHN I) [J].
Birchalll, M. A. ;
Bailey, D. ;
Lennon, A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 83 (04) :421-425
[7]   Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in Ontario, Canada, and in southeastern Norway [J].
Hall, SF ;
Boysen, M ;
Groome, PA ;
Mackillop, W .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2003, 113 (04) :695-701
[8]   Geographical variation in cardiovascular disease, risk factors, and their control in older women: British Women's Heart and Health Study [J].
Lawlor, DA ;
Bedford, C ;
Taylor, M ;
Ebrahim, S .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2003, 57 (02) :134-140
[9]   The surgical management of cervical carcinoma within the South West of England: progress through an audit loop [J].
Murdoch, JB ;
Weeks, JF ;
Howe, K ;
Smith, J ;
Kirkpatrick, A ;
McCrum, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 107 (03) :308-315
[10]   Scottish health executive revamps cancer care [J].
Newman, L .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (17) :1290-1291