Predicting Hydrate-Plug Formation in a Subsea Tieback

被引:28
作者
Davies, Simon R. [1 ]
Boxall, John A. [1 ]
Koh, Carolyn A. [1 ]
Sloan, E. Dendy [1 ]
Hemmingsen, Pal V. [2 ]
Kinnari, Keijo J. [3 ]
Xu, Zheng-Gang
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] StatoilHydro, Trondheim, Norway
[3] StatoilHydro, Stavanger, Norway
来源
SPE PRODUCTION & OPERATIONS | 2009年 / 24卷 / 04期
关键词
METHANE; ETHANE;
D O I
10.2118/115763-PA
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业];
学科分类号
0820 ;
摘要
Field data from StatoilHydro on hydrate-plug formation in the Tommeliten gas/condensate field are compared to predictions of the hydrate-growth model (CSMHyK-OLGA) for four typical operating scenarios: steady-state operation with failure of inhibitor injection, restart of an uninhibited line, restart of an underinhibited line, and restart of a depressurized line. Although the CSMHyK model was designed for oil flowlines, the model is able to predict the correct time scale for hydrate-plug formation in this gas/condensate tieback. The predicted locations of the plugs are often farther upstream than observed in the field trials. This is mainly because of the assumption of a "hydrate/oil slip factor" of zero, which forces the hydrate to accumulate where it initially formed. In reality, hydrate agglomerates would be carried further downstream before eventually jamming in dips. Predicting where and when hydrate plugs will form in subsea tiebacks is of increasing importance as the industry strives to manage the risk of plugging in oil and gas flowlines while minimizing the use of costly and environmentally harmful chemicals for hydrate inhibition. The Colorado School of Mines has been developing the CSMHyK model for the past 5 years, in collaboration with the SPT Group and several leading energy companies.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 578
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
AUSTVIK T, 1995, 7 INT C MULT PROD CA
[2]  
Austvik T., 1997, Proceedings of the 76th Annual GPA Convention, Tulsa, P205
[3]   The next generation of hydrate prediction I. Hydrate standard states and incorporation of spectroscopy [J].
Ballard, AL ;
Sloan, ED .
FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 2002, 194 :371-383
[4]  
BERGE LI, 1994, FIELD TEST TOMMELITE
[5]  
Camargo R., 2002, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Gas Hydrates, P19
[6]  
CHRISTIANSEN RL, 1995, P 74 GAS PROC ASS AN, P15
[7]   KINETICS OF FORMATION OF METHANE AND ETHANE GAS HYDRATES [J].
ENGLEZOS, P ;
KALOGERAKIS, N ;
DHOLABHAI, PD ;
BISHNOI, PR .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1987, 42 (11) :2647-2658
[8]  
KINNARI K, 2006, P 5 N AM C MULT TECH, P21
[9]  
Koh C.A., 2008, OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY, DOI [10.4043/19514-MS, DOI 10.4043/19514-MS]
[10]   Methane-ethane and methane-propane hydrate formation and decomposition on water droplets [J].
Lee, JD ;
Susilo, R ;
Englezos, P .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2005, 60 (15) :4203-4212