Methods for questionnaire design: a taxonomy linking procedures to test goals

被引:40
作者
Oosterveld, Paul [1 ]
Vorst, Harrie C. M. [2 ]
Smits, Niels [3 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dev Psychol, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Res Inst Child Dev & Educ, Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, NL-1018 WS Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Test construction; Questionnaire design; Validity; Measurement; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SCALE-CONSTRUCTION; DIFFERENT STRATEGIES; PROTOTYPE STRATEGY; CONTENT VALIDITY; FACET THEORY; PERSONALITY; VALIDATION; ANXIETY; INSTRUMENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-019-02209-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In the clinical field, the use of questionnaires is ubiquitous, and many different methods for constructing them are available. The reason for using a specific method is usually lacking, and a generally accepted classification of methods is not yet available. To guide test developers and users, this article presents a taxonomy for methods of questionnaire design which links the methods to the goal of a test. Methods The taxonomy assumes that construction methods are directed towards psychometric aspects. Four stages of test construction are distinguished to describe methods: concept analysis, item production, scale construction, and evaluation; the scale construction stage is used for identifying methods. It distinguishes six different methods: the rational method utilizes expert judgments to ensure face validity. The prototypical method uses prototypicality judgments to ensure process validity. In the internal method, item sets are selected that optimize homogeneity. The external method optimizes criterion validity by selecting items that best predict an external criterion. Under the construct method theoretical considerations are used to optimize construct validity. The facet method is aimed at optimizing content validity through a complete representation of the concept domain. Conclusion The taxonomy is comprehensive, constitutes a useful tool for describing procedures used in questionnaire design, and allows for setting up a test construction plan in which the priorities among psychometric aspects are made explicit.
引用
收藏
页码:2501 / 2512
页数:12
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]   The Peritraumatic Behavior Questionnaire: development and initial validation of a new measure for combat-related peritraumatic reactions [J].
Agorastos, Agorastos ;
Nash, William P. ;
Nunnink, Sarah ;
Yurgil, Kate A. ;
Goldsmith, Abigail ;
Litz, Brett T. ;
Johnson, Heather ;
Lohr, James B. ;
Baker, Dewleen G. .
BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 13
[2]   A PROTOTYPE STRATEGY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CREATIVITY SCALE [J].
AMELANG, M ;
HERBOTH, G ;
OEFNER, I .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1991, 5 (04) :261-285
[3]  
American Psychological Association American Educational Research Association & National Council on Measurement in Education, 2014, STAND ED PSYCH TESTS
[4]  
Anastasi A., 1988, Psychological testing
[5]  
[Anonymous], P 15 INT C PSYCH AMS
[6]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN PSYCHOL
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Operationalization and Research Strategy
[8]  
[Anonymous], STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, WILEY HDB PSYCHOMETR
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2000, MANUAL INTERPRETATIO